• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[二次数据分析标准化报告(STROSA)——一项建议]

[STandardized Reporting Of Secondary data Analyses (STROSA)—a recommendation].

作者信息

Swart Enno, Schmitt Jochen

机构信息

Institut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitsökonomie, Medizinische Fakultät der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.

Zentrum für evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Lehrstuhl Sozialmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(8-9):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2014.08.022
PMID:25523850
Abstract

Secondary data analyses will play an increasingly important role in health services research. But to date, there is no guideline for the systematic, transparent and complete reporting of secondary data. We investigated whether the STROBE statement, i.e., the recommendations for reporting observational studies, satisfies the specific characteristics of secondary data analyses and whether any specifications/modifications and extensions are necessary. For the majority of the 22 STROBE criteria, specifications and extensions are needed to meet the requirements of systematic, transparent and complete reporting of secondary data analysis. Seven aspects of secondary data analysis not covered by STROBE (legal aspects, data flow, protocol, unit of analysis, internal validations/definitions, advantages of secondary data utilisation, role of data owners) should be considered as a specific complement to STROBE. The so called STROSA (STandardized Reporting Of Secondary data Analyses) checklist therefore includes 29 items that relate to the title/abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. The STROSA checklist is intended to support authors and readers in the critical appraisal of secondary data analyses. This proposal will now be subject to continued scientific discussions.

摘要

二次数据分析在卫生服务研究中将发挥越来越重要的作用。但迄今为止,尚无关于系统、透明和完整报告二次数据的指南。我们调查了STROBE声明(即观察性研究报告的建议)是否符合二次数据分析的特定特征,以及是否需要任何规范/修改和扩展。对于STROBE的22项标准中的大多数,需要规范和扩展以满足二次数据分析系统、透明和完整报告的要求。STROBE未涵盖的二次数据分析的七个方面(法律方面、数据流、方案、分析单位、内部验证/定义、二次数据利用的优势、数据所有者的作用)应被视为对STROBE的具体补充。因此,所谓的STROSA(二次数据分析标准化报告)清单包括与文章的标题/摘要、引言、方法、结果和讨论部分相关的29项内容。STROSA清单旨在支持作者和读者对二次数据分析进行批判性评价。这一提议现在将继续接受科学讨论。

相似文献

1
[STandardized Reporting Of Secondary data Analyses (STROSA)—a recommendation].[二次数据分析标准化报告(STROSA)——一项建议]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(8-9):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
2
A Consensus German Reporting Standard for Secondary Data Analyses, Version 2 (STROSA-STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen).德国二次数据分析报告标准共识,第2版(STROSA - 二次数据分析标准化报告流程)
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Sep;78(S 01):e145-e160. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108647. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
3
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE):解释与详述
Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511.
4
[Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration].[加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE):解释与详述]
Gac Sanit. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(2):158. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
5
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):800-4. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654.
6
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
7
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察研究报告的强化(STROBE)声明:观察研究报告指南》。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
8
Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guideline.在《加强流行病学观察性研究报告规范》(STROBE)指南发布后,关于混杂因素的报告质量仍未达到最佳水平。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
9
STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology--Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE statement.加强观察性研究在流行病学中的报告——分子流行病学(STROBE-ME):STROBE 声明的扩展。
Mutagenesis. 2012 Jan;27(1):17-29. doi: 10.1093/mutage/ger039. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
10
Strengthening the Reporting of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Diseases (STROME-ID): an extension of the STROBE statement.加强传染病分子流行病学报告(STROME-ID):STROBE 声明的扩展。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;14(4):341-52. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70324-4. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and Validating an Inclusive and Cost-Effective Prediction Algorithm for Survival and Death Among People Living With HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: Protocol for a Meta-Analysis and Case-Control and Cost-Effectiveness Study.为撒哈拉以南非洲地区的艾滋病毒感染者开发并验证一种具有包容性且成本效益高的生存与死亡预测算法:一项荟萃分析、病例对照及成本效益研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 29;14:e63783. doi: 10.2196/63783.
2
Epidemiology and Health Care of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis in Germany - Methodology and Outcomes of Claims Data Analysis.德国泛发性脓疱型银屑病的流行病学与医疗保健——索赔数据分析的方法与结果
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2025 Jul 15;15:273-283. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S529515. eCollection 2025.
3
Identifying barriers and disparities in the healthcare of patients with alopecia areata: a mixed-methods analysis using claims data and qualitative interview data.
识别斑秃患者医疗保健中的障碍和差异:一项使用索赔数据和定性访谈数据的混合方法分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 30;15(5):e098802. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098802.
4
Impact of linkage level on inferences from big data analyses in health and medical research: an empirical study.关联水平对健康和医学研究中大数据分析推论的影响:一项实证研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02586-0.
5
Comparison of student nurses' expectations and newly qualified nurses' experiences regarding clinical practice: A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey.学生护士对临床实践的期望与新取得资格护士临床实践经历的比较:一项横断面调查的二次分析
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jan;81(1):237-248. doi: 10.1111/jan.16211. Epub 2024 May 7.
6
Real-world evidence of treatment patterns and survival of metastatic gastric cancer patients in Germany.德国转移性胃癌患者的治疗模式和生存的真实世界证据。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 13;24(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12204-x.
7
Treatment in certified cancer centers is related to better survival in patients with colon and rectal cancer: evidence from a large German cohort study.在认证癌症中心治疗与结直肠癌患者更好的生存相关:来自大型德国队列研究的证据。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan 6;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03262-9.
8
Epidemiology of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia in Germany Based on Real World Data.基于真实世界数据的德国肿瘤相关性骨软化症流行病学研究。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2023 Dec;113(6):630-639. doi: 10.1007/s00223-023-01148-2. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
9
Spinal mobilization force-time characteristics: A scoping literature review.脊柱活动力-时间特征:范围文献综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 14;18(11):e0289462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289462. eCollection 2023.
10
Agreement between self-reports and statutory health insurance claims data on healthcare utilization in patients with mental disorders.精神障碍患者医疗利用的自我报告与法定医疗保险索赔数据之间的一致性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 11;23(1):1243. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10175-6.