• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾脏解剖结构对冲击波碎石术治疗下极肾结石效果的影响:一项前瞻性多因素分析的结果,该分析通过计算机断层扫描进行控制。

Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Stevan B. Streem Center for Endourology and Stone Disease, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute (MM), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Division of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Stevan B. Streem Center for Endourology and Stone Disease, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute (MM), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Urol. 2015 Jun;193(6):2002-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.026. Epub 2014 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.026
PMID:25524240
Abstract

PURPOSE

We evaluated which variables impact fragmentation and clearance of lower pole calculi after shock wave lithotripsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively evaluated patients undergoing shock wave lithotripsy for a solitary 5 to 20 mm lower pole kidney stone between June 2012 and August 2014. Patient body mass index and abdominal waist circumference were recorded. One radiologist blinded to shock wave lithotripsy outcomes measured stone size, area and density, stone-to-skin distance, infundibular length, width and height, and infundibulopelvic angle based on baseline noncontrast computerized tomography. Fragmentation, success (defined as residual fragments less than 4 mm in asymptomatic patients) and the stone-free rate were evaluated by noncontrast computerized tomography 12 weeks postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the study. Mean stone size was 9.1 mm. Overall fragmentation, success and stone-free rates were 76%, 54% and 37%, respectively. On logistic regression body mass index (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.49, p = 0.004) and stone density (OR 1.0026, 95% CI 1.0008-1.0046, p = 0.005) significantly impacted fragmentation. Stone size (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07-1.48, p = 0.039) and stone density (OR 1.0021, 95% CI 1.0007-1.0037, p = 0.012) impacted the success rate while stone size (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.50, p = 0.029), stone density (OR 1.0015, 95% CI 1.0001-1.0032, p = 0.046) and infundibular length (OR 1.1035, 95% CI 1.015-1.217, p = 0.015) impacted the stone-free rate. The best outcomes were found in patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m(2) or less, stones 10 mm or less and 900 HU or less, and an infundibular length of 25 mm or less. The coexistence of significant unfavorable variables led to a stone-free rate of less than 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese patients with higher than 10 mm density stones (greater than 900 HU) in the lower pole of the kidney with an infundibular length of greater than 25 mm should be discouraged from undergoing shock wave lithotripsy.

摘要

目的

我们评估了冲击波碎石术(SWL)后哪些变量会影响下极结石的碎裂和清除。

材料和方法

我们前瞻性地评估了 2012 年 6 月至 2014 年 8 月期间接受 SWL 治疗的孤立性 5 至 20mm 下极肾结石患者。记录患者的体重指数和腹围。一名放射科医生在不知道冲击波碎石术结果的情况下,根据基线非增强计算机断层扫描(CT)测量结石大小、面积和密度、结石-皮肤距离、漏斗长度、宽度和高度以及漏斗-肾盂角。术后 12 周通过非增强 CT 评估碎裂、成功(定义为无症状患者残留碎片小于 4mm)和无石率。进行单变量和多变量分析。

结果

共纳入 100 例患者。平均结石大小为 9.1mm。总体碎裂、成功和无石率分别为 76%、54%和 37%。在逻辑回归中,体重指数(OR 1.27,95%CI 1.11-1.49,p=0.004)和结石密度(OR 1.0026,95%CI 1.0008-1.0046,p=0.005)显著影响碎裂。结石大小(OR 1.24,95%CI 1.07-1.48,p=0.039)和结石密度(OR 1.0021,95%CI 1.0007-1.0037,p=0.012)影响成功率,而结石大小(OR 1.24,95%CI 1.04-1.50,p=0.029)、结石密度(OR 1.0015,95%CI 1.0001-1.0032,p=0.046)和漏斗长度(OR 1.1035,95%CI 1.015-1.217,p=0.015)影响无石率。在体重指数为 30kg/m2 或以下、结石大小为 10mm 或以下、密度为 900HU 或以下、漏斗长度为 25mm 或以下的患者中发现了最佳结果。显著不利变量的共存导致无石率低于 20%。

结论

体重指数大于 30kg/m2、结石密度大于 10mm(大于 900HU)、下极漏斗长度大于 25mm 的肥胖患者,不建议行 SWL 治疗。

相似文献

1
Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.肾脏解剖结构对冲击波碎石术治疗下极肾结石效果的影响:一项前瞻性多因素分析的结果,该分析通过计算机断层扫描进行控制。
J Urol. 2015 Jun;193(6):2002-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.026. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
2
Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.冲击波碎石术或输尿管镜检查术后下盏结石清除率:下极影像学解剖结构的影响
J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):676-82.
3
Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up.肾结石特征比肾脏解剖结构更能预测体外冲击波碎石术的结果:一项前瞻性研究并结合 CT 随访的结果。
J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):63-67. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0545. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
4
Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction?下极肾解剖结构对冲击波碎石术后结石清除率的影响:事实还是虚构?
J Urol. 2001 May;165(5):1415-8.
5
The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.肾盂肾盏解剖结构对小儿下极结石冲击波碎石术后结石清除的影响。
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1082-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000135670.83076.5c.
6
Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.解剖学肾盂肾盏形态对体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾下盏结石的影响
Int J Urol. 2005 Jun;12(6):525-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x.
7
Prediction of lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy using an artificial neural network.使用人工神经网络预测冲击波碎石术后下极结石清除情况。
J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1250-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000055624.65386.b9.
8
Lower pole ratio: a new and accurate predictor of lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy?下极比率:冲击波碎石术后下极结石清除的一种新的准确预测指标?
Int J Urol. 2004 Sep;11(9):700-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00877.x.
9
Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones?下极肾盏解剖结构能否预测原发性下极肾结石体外冲击波碎石术的成功率?
J Urol. 2002 Dec;168(6):2377-82; discussion 2382. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64149-3.
10
A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography.体外冲击波碎石术预测结石碎裂相关因素的前瞻性多变量分析:高分辨率非增强计算机断层扫描的价值
Eur Urol. 2007 Jun;51(6):1688-93; discussion 1693-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.048. Epub 2006 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
"Virgin ureter" vs. "non-virgin ureter"? A comparative analysis on complications and failure of retrograde intrarenal surgery: a multicentre case-control study from RIRSearch Group.“未处理输尿管”与“已处理输尿管”?逆行性肾内手术并发症与失败情况的比较分析:RIRSearch 研究组的一项多中心病例对照研究
Urolithiasis. 2025 Apr 28;53(1):83. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01750-z.
2
The Saudi urological association guidelines on urolithiasis.沙特泌尿外科协会尿路结石指南。
Urol Ann. 2024 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-27. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_120_23. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
3
Comparison of Ultra-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis from the KSER Update Series.
超微经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石的比较:KSER更新系列的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 10;11(6):1529. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061529.
4
Treatment of renal lower pole stones: an update.肾下极结石的治疗:最新进展
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jan-Feb;48(1):165-174. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1023.
5
Predicting shockwave lithotripsy outcome for urolithiasis using clinical and stone computed tomography texture analysis variables.使用临床和结石 CT 纹理分析变量预测上尿路结石的体外冲击波碎石术疗效。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 11;9(1):14674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51026-x.
6
Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters for Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcome in Upper Urinary Tract Stone Cases.非对比 CT 参数对上尿路结石钬激光碎石术治疗结果的预测作用。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 2;2018:9253952. doi: 10.1155/2018/9253952. eCollection 2018.
7
Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.利用非增强计算机断层扫描揭示活动性肾结石治疗的真实结果:对当前文献的系统评价
World J Urol. 2017 Jun;35(6):897-905. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1943-y. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
8
Difference of opinion--In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy? Opinion: NO.观点分歧——在输尿管软镜时代,冲击波碎石术是否仍有一席之地?观点:否。
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Mar-Apr;41(2):203-6. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.04.