• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用临床和结石 CT 纹理分析变量预测上尿路结石的体外冲击波碎石术疗效。

Predicting shockwave lithotripsy outcome for urolithiasis using clinical and stone computed tomography texture analysis variables.

机构信息

Oxford Stone Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

University of Lisbon, Faculty of Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 11;9(1):14674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51026-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-51026-x
PMID:31604986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6788981/
Abstract

We aimed to develop and evaluate a statistical model, which included known pre-treatment factors and new computed tomography texture analysis (CTTA) variables, for its ability to predict the likelihood of a successful outcome after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment for renal and ureteric stones. Up to half of patients undergoing SWL may fail treatment. Better prediction of which cases will likely succeed SWL will help patients to make an informed decision on the most effective treatment modality for their stone. 19 pre-treatment factors for SWL success, including 6 CTTA variables, were collected from 459 SWL cases at a single centre. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed by independent statisticians to predict the probability of a stone free (both with and without residual fragments) outcome after SWL. A multivariable model had an overall accuracy of 66% on Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) analysis to predict for successful SWL outcome. The variables most frequently chosen for the model were those which represented stone size. Although previous studies have suggested SWL can be reliably predicted using pre-treatment factors and that analysis of CT stone images may improve outcome prediction, the results from this study have not produced a useful model for SWL outcome prediction.

摘要

我们旨在开发和评估一个统计模型,该模型包含已知的治疗前因素和新的计算机断层扫描纹理分析(CTTA)变量,以预测体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗肾和输尿管结石后成功的可能性。多达一半的接受 SWL 治疗的患者可能会失败。更好地预测哪些病例可能成功接受 SWL 治疗将有助于患者对其结石最有效的治疗方式做出明智的决定。从单一中心的 459 例 SWL 病例中收集了 19 个 SWL 成功的治疗前因素,包括 6 个 CTTA 变量。由独立统计学家进行单变量和多变量分析,以预测 SWL 后结石(无残余碎片和有残余碎片)的可能性。多变量模型在接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析中对成功 SWL 结果的总体准确性为 66%。模型中最常选择的变量是代表结石大小的变量。尽管之前的研究表明可以使用治疗前因素可靠地预测 SWL,并且分析 CT 结石图像可能会改善结果预测,但这项研究的结果并未产生用于 SWL 结果预测的有用模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fb/6788981/0378bd1a7d82/41598_2019_51026_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fb/6788981/c5a69c416e1b/41598_2019_51026_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fb/6788981/1d53e431361e/41598_2019_51026_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fb/6788981/c6b58ce19a2c/41598_2019_51026_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fb/6788981/0378bd1a7d82/41598_2019_51026_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fb/6788981/c5a69c416e1b/41598_2019_51026_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fb/6788981/1d53e431361e/41598_2019_51026_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fb/6788981/c6b58ce19a2c/41598_2019_51026_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fb/6788981/0378bd1a7d82/41598_2019_51026_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting shockwave lithotripsy outcome for urolithiasis using clinical and stone computed tomography texture analysis variables.使用临床和结石 CT 纹理分析变量预测上尿路结石的体外冲击波碎石术疗效。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 11;9(1):14674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51026-x.
2
CT Texture Analysis of Ex Vivo Renal Stones Predicts Ease of Fragmentation with Shockwave Lithotripsy.离体肾结石的CT纹理分析可预测冲击波碎石术的碎石难易程度。
J Endourol. 2017 Jul;31(7):694-700. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0084. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
3
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.高分辨率CT参数预测上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术成功率的前瞻性评估
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
4
Noncontrast computed tomography can predict the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy via accurate stone measurement and abdominal fat distribution determination.非增强计算机断层扫描可通过精确的结石测量和腹部脂肪分布测定来预测冲击波碎石术的结果。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015 Jan;31(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
5
The utility of automated volume analysis of renal stones before and after shockwave lithotripsy treatment.冲击波碎石术前后肾结石自动体积分析的实用性。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Jun;49(3):219-226. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01212-8. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
6
Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.评估平均结石密度和皮肤至结石距离在预测肾和输尿管结石冲击波碎石术成功率中的重要性。
Urol Res. 2010 Aug;38(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
7
Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones.临床和放射学参数在预测输尿管结石冲击波碎石术结果中的作用。
Urol Ann. 2018 Apr-Jun;10(2):159-164. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_84_17.
8
Factors predictive of shockwave lithotripsy failure for ureteral stones: why we need to hurry.输尿管结石冲击波碎石术失败的预测因素:我们为何需要抓紧时间。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019 Dec;71(6):644-650. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03346-0. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
9
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.一种用于预测儿童冲击波碎石术治疗结果的新列线图。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
10
The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes.腹部脂肪参数和结石密度对体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的预测作用。
Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2020;16(1):80-87. doi: 10.2174/1573405614666180927112127.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical applications of AI in body imaging.人工智能在人体成像中的实际应用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05088-3.
2
CT-based radiomics for predicting success of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.基于 CT 的放射组学预测大于 1 厘米的输尿管结石冲击波碎石术的成功率。
World J Urol. 2024 Jul 10;42(1):397. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05111-0.
3
Stone decision engine accurately predicts stone removal and treatment complications for shock wave lithotripsy and laser ureterorenoscopy patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters for Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcome in Upper Urinary Tract Stone Cases.非对比 CT 参数对上尿路结石钬激光碎石术治疗结果的预测作用。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 2;2018:9253952. doi: 10.1155/2018/9253952. eCollection 2018.
2
Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect?单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石:CT 纹理分析技术能否帮助预测疗效?
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Oct;107:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
Three-Dimensional Texture Analysis with Machine Learning Provides Incremental Predictive Information for Successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Kidney Stones.
结石决策引擎可准确预测冲击波碎石术和激光输尿管镜取石术患者的结石清除和治疗并发症。
PLoS One. 2024 May 2;19(5):e0301812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301812. eCollection 2024.
4
Predictors of stone-free rate after a single-session extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for a single kidney stone measuring 10 to 20 mm: A private center experience.单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗单个直径为10至20毫米肾结石后结石清除率的预测因素:一家私立中心的经验
Curr Urol. 2023 Mar;17(1):30-35. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000152. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
5
The utility of automated volume analysis of renal stones before and after shockwave lithotripsy treatment.冲击波碎石术前后肾结石自动体积分析的实用性。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Jun;49(3):219-226. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01212-8. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
基于机器学习的三维纹理分析可为肾结石患者冲击波碎石成功提供增量预测信息。
J Urol. 2018 Oct;200(4):829-836. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.059. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
4
CT Texture Analysis of Ex Vivo Renal Stones Predicts Ease of Fragmentation with Shockwave Lithotripsy.离体肾结石的CT纹理分析可预测冲击波碎石术的碎石难易程度。
J Endourol. 2017 Jul;31(7):694-700. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0084. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
5
Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II.结石的外科治疗:美国泌尿外科学会/腔内泌尿外科学会指南,第二部分。
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091. Epub 2016 May 27.
6
Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi.结石异质性指数作为亨氏单位的标准差:输尿管结石冲击波碎石术结果的一种新型预测指标。
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 1;6:23988. doi: 10.1038/srep23988.
7
Is Ureteroscopy as Good as We Think?输尿管镜检查真如我们所想的那么好吗?
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):823-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.061. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
8
Internal Structure of Kidney Calculi as a Predictor for Shockwave Lithotripsy Success.肾结石的内部结构作为冲击波碎石术成功的预测指标
J Endourol. 2016 Mar;30(3):323-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0616. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
9
Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.肾脏解剖结构对冲击波碎石术治疗下极肾结石效果的影响:一项前瞻性多因素分析的结果,该分析通过计算机断层扫描进行控制。
J Urol. 2015 Jun;193(6):2002-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.026. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
10
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.