Suppr超能文献

斯堪的纳维亚成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气临床实践指南。

Scandinavian clinical practice guideline on mechanical ventilation in adults with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

Claesson J, Freundlich M, Gunnarsson I, Laake J H, Vandvik P O, Varpula T, Aasmundstad T A

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Surgical Division, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Mar;59(3):286-97. doi: 10.1111/aas.12449. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI) task force on mechanical ventilation in adults with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is to formulate treatment recommendations based on available evidence from systematic reviews and randomised trials.

METHODS

This guideline was developed according to standards for trustworthy guidelines through a systematic review of the literature and the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system for assessment of the quality of evidence and for moving from evidence to recommendations in a systematic and transparent process.

RESULTS

We found evidence of moderately high quality to support a strong recommendation for pressure limitation and small tidal volumes in patients with ARDS. Also, we suggest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) > 5 cm H2O in moderate to severe ARDS and prone ventilation 16/24 h for the first week in moderate to severe ARDS (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). Volume controlled ventilation or pressure control may be equally beneficial or harmful and partial modes of ventilatory support may be used if clinically feasible (weak recommendation, very low quality evidence). We suggest utilising recruitment manoeuvres as a rescue measure in catastrophic hypoxaemia only (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). Based on high-quality evidence, we strongly recommend not to use high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. We could find no relevant data from randomised trials to guide decisions on choice of FiO2 or utilisation of non-invasive ventilation.

CONCLUSION

We strongly recommend pressure- and volume limitation and suggest using higher PEEP and prone ventilation in patients with severe respiratory failure.

摘要

背景

斯堪的纳维亚麻醉与重症监护医学学会(SSAI)急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)成人机械通气工作组的目标是根据系统评价和随机试验的现有证据制定治疗建议。

方法

本指南是根据可靠指南的标准制定的,通过对文献进行系统评价,并使用推荐分级评估、制定与评价系统来评估证据质量,并以系统、透明的过程从证据得出建议。

结果

我们发现有中等高质量的证据支持对ARDS患者进行压力限制和小潮气量通气的强烈推荐。此外,我们建议在中度至重度ARDS患者中使用呼气末正压(PEEP)>5 cm H₂O,在中度至重度ARDS患者的第一周采用俯卧位通气16/24小时(弱推荐,低质量证据)。容量控制通气或压力控制可能同样有益或有害,如果临床可行,可使用部分通气支持模式(弱推荐,极低质量证据)。我们建议仅在灾难性低氧血症时将肺复张手法作为一种挽救措施(弱推荐,低质量证据)。基于高质量证据,我们强烈建议不使用高频振荡通气。我们未从随机试验中找到相关数据来指导关于选择FiO₂或使用无创通气的决策。

结论

我们强烈推荐进行压力和容量限制,并建议在严重呼吸衰竭患者中使用较高的PEEP和俯卧位通气。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验