• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的开源呼吸机设计考量:一项系统综述

Evidence-Based Considerations for the Design of an Open-Source Ventilator: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Dave Chintan, Sivajohan Asaanth, Basmaji John, Slessarev Marat

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, ON.

Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jun 30;4(7):e0723. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000723. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000723
PMID:35795401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9249267/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

To inform the design of open-source ventilators, we performed a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to consolidate the evidence on mechanical ventilation strategies that result in improved patient-important outcomes for acute hypoxic respiratory failure.

DATA SOURCES

We developed a search strategy to identify relevant CPGs from Ovid Medline, Ovid Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Mendeley, and Google scholar from 2010 to February 17, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Using a two-step screening process with two independent reviewers, we included CPGs that made recommendations on mechanical ventilation strategies of interest. Guidelines that reported at least one recommendation about mechanical ventilation in ICU patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

From the 13 eligible guidelines, we collected data on country, aim, patient population, impact on morbidity and mortality (effect size and CIs), recommendations, strength of Recommendation (as per Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations), and details of supporting evidence base.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We identified three ventilation strategies that confer a mortality and morbidity benefit for ventilated patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure: low-tidal volume ventilation, plateau pressures of less than 30 cm HO, and higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). These moderate-to-strong recommendations were based on moderate-to-high certainty in evidence. We identified several other recommendations with no or minimal certainty in evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review of international CPGs identified no recommendations favoring specific mode of ventilation and three ventilation strategies that confer mortality and morbidity benefits, backed by moderate-to-strong evidence. Ventilator design teams must include the ability to consistently provide and measure low-tidal volume ventilation, plateau pressures of less than 30 cm HO, and higher PEEP into their designs. Based on our findings, we provide the first public framework for open-source ventilator design.

摘要

未标注

为指导开源呼吸机的设计,我们对临床实践指南(CPG)进行了系统评价,以整合关于机械通气策略的证据,这些策略能改善急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的重要预后。

数据来源

我们制定了检索策略,以识别2010年至2022年2月17日期间来自Ovid Medline、Ovid Medline在研及其他未索引引文、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Mendeley和谷歌学术的相关CPG。

研究选择

通过两名独立评审员的两步筛选过程,我们纳入了对感兴趣的机械通气策略提出建议的CPG。纳入了报告了至少一项关于急性低氧性呼吸衰竭ICU患者机械通气建议的指南。

数据提取

从13项符合条件的指南中,我们收集了关于国家、目的、患者群体、对发病率和死亡率的影响(效应大小和置信区间)、建议、推荐强度(根据推荐分级、评估、制定和评价)以及支持证据基础细节的数据。

数据综合

我们确定了三种通气策略,对急性低氧性呼吸衰竭的通气患者具有降低死亡率和发病率的益处:低潮气量通气、平台压小于30 cm H₂O以及较高的呼气末正压(PEEP)。这些中等到强烈建议基于证据的中等到高度确定性。我们还确定了其他一些证据确定性低或无的建议。

结论

我们对国际CPG的系统评价未发现支持特定通气模式的建议,而是确定了三种具有降低死亡率和发病率益处的通气策略,并有中等到强有力的证据支持。呼吸机设计团队必须在其设计中纳入持续提供和测量低潮气量通气、平台压小于30 cm H₂O以及较高PEEP的能力。基于我们的研究结果,我们提供了首个开源呼吸机设计的公共框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/511d/9249267/9034dc5e9025/cc9-4-e0723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/511d/9249267/9034dc5e9025/cc9-4-e0723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/511d/9249267/9034dc5e9025/cc9-4-e0723-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence-Based Considerations for the Design of an Open-Source Ventilator: A Systematic Review.基于证据的开源呼吸机设计考量:一项系统综述
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jun 30;4(7):e0723. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000723. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.高与低呼气末正压通气(PEEP)水平对机械通气成人急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 30;3(3):CD009098. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009098.pub3.
4
Extracorporeal lung support technologies - bridge to recovery and bridge to lung transplantation in adult patients: an evidence-based analysis.体外肺支持技术——成人患者的康复桥梁和肺移植桥梁:一项基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(5):1-47. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Recruitment manoeuvres for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving mechanical ventilation.接受机械通气的成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征的肺复张手法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):CD006667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006667.pub3.
7
Low Tidal Volume versus Non-Volume-Limited Strategies for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.低潮气量与非容量限制策略治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S271-S279. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-337OT.
8
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP Strategies for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高呼气末正压(PEEP)与低呼气末正压策略治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S297-S303. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-338OT.
9
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.危重症 COVID-19 患者的早期与晚期气管切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 20;11(11):CD015532. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015532.
10
Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults.成人急性呼吸衰竭的俯卧位
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 13;2015(11):CD008095. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008095.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of the coronavirus pandemic on sedation in critical care: volatile anesthetics in the ICU.冠状病毒大流行对重症监护镇静的影响:重症监护室中的挥发性麻醉剂。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Feb 1;29(1):14-18. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001011. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
2
COVID-19 Lessons Learned: Response to the Anticipated Ventilator Shortage.COVID-19 经验教训:应对预计的呼吸机短缺。
Respir Care. 2023 Jan;68(1):129-150. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10676.

本文引用的文献

1
Frugal Innovation: Enabling Mechanical Ventilation During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in Resource-Limited Settings.节俭创新:在资源有限环境下助力2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的机械通气
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Apr 26;3(4):e0410. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000410. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Ventilatory Variables and Mechanical Power in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的通气变量和机械功率。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Aug 1;204(3):303-311. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3467OC.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Pragmatic Recommendations for the Management of Acute Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.资源有限国家中 COVID-19 患者急性呼吸衰竭和机械通气管理的实用建议。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jan 13;104(3_Suppl):60-71. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0796.
5
Mitigating Inequities and Saving Lives with ICU Triage during the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间通过 ICU 分诊减轻不平等和拯救生命。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;203(3):287-295. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202010-3809CP.
6
Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of 11 721 Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Hospitalized Across the United States.美国11721例2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者的特征及预后
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 18;72(10):e558-e565. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1268.
7
A review of open source ventilators for COVID-19 and future pandemics.开源呼吸机在 COVID-19 及未来大流行中的应用综述
F1000Res. 2020 Mar 30;9:218. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22942.2. eCollection 2020.
8
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).拯救脓毒症运动:2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)危重症成人管理指南。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):854-887. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06022-5. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
9
Lung-kidney interactions in critically ill patients: consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) 21 Workgroup.危重症患者的肺-肾交互作用:急性疾病质量倡议 (ADQI) 21 工作组的共识报告。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):654-672. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05869-7. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
10
Guidelines on the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征管理指南。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 May 24;6(1):e000420. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000420. eCollection 2019.