Doolette David J, Upton Richard N, Grant Cliff
Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and
Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Australian Centre for Pharmacometrics, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 Mar 1;118(5):586-94. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00944.2014. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
In underwater diving, decompression schedules are based on compartmental models of nitrogen and helium tissue kinetics. However, these models are not based on direct measurements of nitrogen and helium kinetics. In isoflurane-anesthetized sheep, nitrogen and helium kinetics in the hind limb (n = 5) and brain (n = 5) were determined during helium-oxygen breathing and after return to nitrogen-oxygen breathing. Nitrogen and helium concentrations in arterial, femoral vein, and sagittal sinus blood samples were determined using headspace gas chromatography, and venous blood flows were monitored continuously using ultrasonic Doppler. The experiment was repeated at different states of hind limb blood flow and cerebral blood flow. Using arterial blood gas concentrations and blood flows as input, parameters and model selection criteria of various compartmental models of hind limb and brain were estimated by fitting to the observed venous gas concentrations. In both the hind limb and brain, nitrogen and helium kinetics were best fit by models with multiexponential kinetics. In the brain, there were no differences in nitrogen and helium kinetics. Hind limb models fit separately to the two gases indicated that nitrogen kinetics were slightly faster than helium, but models with the same kinetics for both gases fit the data well. In the hind limb and brain, the blood:tissue exchange of nitrogen is similar to that of helium. On the basis of these results, it is inappropriate to assign substantially different time constants for nitrogen and helium in all compartments in decompression algorithms.
在水下潜水时,减压时间表是基于氮气和氦气组织动力学的房室模型制定的。然而,这些模型并非基于对氮气和氦气动力学的直接测量。在异氟烷麻醉的绵羊中,在氦氧呼吸期间以及恢复到氮氧呼吸后,测定了后肢(n = 5)和大脑(n = 5)中的氮气和氦气动力学。使用顶空气相色谱法测定动脉血、股静脉血和矢状窦血样本中的氮气和氦气浓度,并使用超声多普勒连续监测静脉血流。在不同的后肢血流和脑血流状态下重复该实验。以动脉血气浓度和血流作为输入,通过拟合观察到的静脉气体浓度来估计后肢和大脑各种房室模型的参数和模型选择标准。在后肢和大脑中,氮气和氦气动力学最适合用具有多指数动力学的模型来描述。在大脑中,氮气和氦气动力学没有差异。分别针对两种气体拟合的后肢模型表明,氮气动力学略快于氦气,但两种气体具有相同动力学的模型对数据拟合良好。在后肢和大脑中,氮气的血液 - 组织交换与氦气相似。基于这些结果,在减压算法中为所有房室中的氮气和氦气指定显著不同的时间常数是不合适的。