Qureshi Adnan I, Chaudhry Saqib A, Qureshi Mushtaq H, Suri M Fareed K
Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Institute and Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, CentraCare Health, St. Cloud, Minnesota.
Neurosurgery. 2015 Jan;76(1):34-40; discussion 40-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000551.
Current American Heart Association guidelines recommend carotid revascularization for asymptomatic patients on the basis of life expectancy.
To determine the rates and predictors of 5-year survival in elderly patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis who underwent either carotid artery stent placement (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
The rates of 5-year survival were determined by use of Kaplan-Meier survival methods in a representative sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years of age who underwent CAS or CEA for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis with postprocedural follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.7 years. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess the relative risk of all-cause mortality for patients in the presence of selected comorbidities, including ischemic heart disease, chronic renal failure, and atrial fibrillation, after adjustment for potential confounders such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, and procedure type.
A total of 22,177 patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis were treated with either CAS (n = 2144) or CEA (n = 20,033). The overall estimated 5-year survival rate (±SE) was 95.3 ± 0.00149; it was 95.5% and 93.8% in patients treated with CEA and CAS, respectively. After adjustment for potential confounders, relative risk of all-cause 5-year mortality was significantly higher among patients with atrial fibrillation (relative risk, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.1) and those with chronic renal failure (relative risk, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.6).
Risks and benefits must be carefully weighed before carotid revascularization in elderly patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis who have concurrent atrial fibrillation or chronic renal failure.
美国心脏协会当前指南建议根据预期寿命对无症状患者进行颈动脉血运重建。
确定接受颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)或颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的无症状颈动脉狭窄老年患者的5年生存率及预测因素。
采用Kaplan-Meier生存方法确定≥65岁接受CAS或CEA治疗无症状颈动脉狭窄且术后随访3.4±1.7年的按服务收费的医疗保险受益人的代表性样本中的5年生存率。采用Cox比例风险分析评估在调整年龄、性别、种族/民族和手术类型等潜在混杂因素后,患有选定合并症(包括缺血性心脏病、慢性肾衰竭和心房颤动)的患者全因死亡的相对风险。
共有22177例无症状颈动脉狭窄患者接受了CAS(n = 2144)或CEA(n = 20033)治疗。总体估计5年生存率(±SE)为95.3±0.00149;接受CEA和CAS治疗的患者分别为95.5%和93.8%。在调整潜在混杂因素后,心房颤动患者(相对风险,1.8;95%置信区间,1.5 - 2.1)和慢性肾衰竭患者(相对风险,2.1;95%置信区间,1.7 - 2.6)的5年全因死亡相对风险显著更高。
对于合并心房颤动或慢性肾衰竭的无症状颈动脉狭窄老年患者,在进行颈动脉血运重建之前,必须仔细权衡风险和益处。