Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术:当前概念与实践模式

Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Concepts and Practice Patterns.

作者信息

Saha Sibu P, Saha Subhajit, Vyas Krishna S

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.

MediCiti Institute of Medical Science, Hyderabad, India.

出版信息

Int J Angiol. 2015 Sep;24(3):223-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558645. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

Abstract

Background Stroke is the number one cause of disability and third leading cause of death among adults in the United States. A major cause of stroke is carotid artery stenosis (CAS) caused by atherosclerotic plaques. Randomized trials have varying results regarding the equivalence and perioperative complication rates of stents versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the management of CAS. Objectives We review the evidence for the current management of CAS and describe the current concepts and practice patterns of CEA. Methods A literature search was conducted using PubMed to identify relevant studies regarding CEA and stenting for the management of CAS. Results The introduction of CAS has led to a decrease in the percentage of CEA and an increase in the number of CAS procedures performed in the context of all revascularization procedures. However, the efficacy of stents in patients with symptomatic CAS remains unclear because of varying results among randomized trials, but the perioperative complication rates exceed those found after CEA. Conclusions Vascular surgeons are uniquely positioned to treat carotid artery disease through medical therapy, CEA, and stenting. Although data from randomized trials differ, it is important for surgeons to make clinical decisions based on the patient. We believe that CAS can be adopted with low complication rate in a selected subgroup of patients, but CEA should remain the standard of care. This current evidence should be incorporated into practice of the modern vascular surgeon.

摘要

背景

在美国成年人中,中风是导致残疾的首要原因,也是第三大死因。中风的一个主要原因是动脉粥样硬化斑块导致的颈动脉狭窄(CAS)。在CAS的治疗中,关于支架与颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的等效性和围手术期并发症发生率,随机试验有不同的结果。

目的

我们回顾了当前CAS治疗的证据,并描述了CEA的当前概念和实践模式。

方法

使用PubMed进行文献检索,以确定关于CEA和支架置入术治疗CAS的相关研究。

结果

CAS的引入导致CEA的比例下降,并且在所有血管重建手术中,CAS手术的数量增加。然而,由于随机试验结果不同,有症状的CAS患者中支架的疗效仍不明确,但围手术期并发症发生率超过CEA术后的发生率。

结论

血管外科医生在通过药物治疗、CEA和支架置入术治疗颈动脉疾病方面具有独特的地位。尽管随机试验的数据不同,但外科医生根据患者情况做出临床决策很重要。我们认为,在选定的患者亚组中可以采用CAS,且并发症发生率较低,但CEA仍应是治疗的标准。当前的这些证据应纳入现代血管外科医生的实践中。

相似文献

1
Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Concepts and Practice Patterns.颈动脉内膜切除术:当前概念与实践模式
Int J Angiol. 2015 Sep;24(3):223-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558645. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
8
National trends in carotid artery revascularization surgery.颈动脉血运重建手术的国家趋势。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;116(6):1251-7. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.JNS111320. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Fast-Track Protocol for Carotid Surgery.颈动脉手术快速通道方案
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):4294. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124294.

本文引用的文献

4
Effect of CREST Findings on Carotid Revascularization Practice in the United States.CREST研究结果对美国颈动脉血管重建术实践的影响。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Jun;24(6):1390-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Thirty-day outcome of delayed versus early management of symptomatic carotid stenosis.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Jul;29(5):977-84. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
8
A selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy: prospective MR DWI monitoring of embolization in a group of 754 patients.
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;76(2):89-92. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393931. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验