Milbrath Meghan O, van Tran Toan, Huang Wei-Fong, Solter Leellen F, Tarpy David R, Lawrence Frank, Huang Zachary Y
Department of Entomology, Natural Science Building, 288 Farm Lane Room 243, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Department of Entomology, Natural Science Building, 288 Farm Lane Room 243, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Bee Research and Development Center, N(0) 19 Truc Khe, Lang Ha, Dong Da, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.
J Invertebr Pathol. 2015 Feb;125:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
Honey bees (Apis mellifera) are infected by two species of microsporidia: Nosema apis and Nosemaceranae. Epidemiological evidence indicates that N. ceranae may be replacing N. apis globally in A. mellifera populations, suggesting a potential competitive advantage of N. ceranae. Mixed infections of the two species occur, and little is known about the interactions among the host and the two pathogens that have allowed N. ceranae to become dominant in most geographical areas. We demonstrated that mixed Nosema species infections negatively affected honey bee survival (median survival=15-17days) more than single species infections (median survival=21days and 20days for N. apis and N. ceranae, respectively), with median survival of control bees of 27days. We found similar rates of infection (percentage of bees with active infections after inoculation) for both species in mixed infections, with N. apis having a slightly higher rate (91% compared to 86% for N. ceranae). We observed slightly higher spore counts in bees infected with N. ceranae than in bees infected with N. apis in single microsporidia infections, especially at the midpoint of infection (day 10). Bees with mixed infections of both species had higher spore counts than bees with single infections, but spore counts in mixed infections were highly variable. We did not see a competitive advantage for N. ceranae in mixed infections; N. apis spore counts were either higher or counts were similar for both species and more N. apis spores were produced in 62% of bees inoculated with equal dosages of the two microsporidian species. N. ceranae does not, therefore, appear to have a strong within-host advantage for either infectivity or spore growth, suggesting that direct competition in these worker bee mid-guts is not responsible for its apparent replacement of N. apis.
蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)会受到两种微孢子虫的感染:蜜蜂微孢子虫和东方蜜蜂微孢子虫。流行病学证据表明,在全球范围内,东方蜜蜂微孢子虫可能正在取代西方蜜蜂种群中的蜜蜂微孢子虫,这表明东方蜜蜂微孢子虫具有潜在的竞争优势。两种微孢子虫会发生混合感染,而对于宿主与这两种病原体之间的相互作用,人们了解甚少,正是这些相互作用使得东方蜜蜂微孢子虫在大多数地理区域占据了主导地位。我们证明,与单一物种感染(蜜蜂微孢子虫和东方蜜蜂微孢子虫单一感染的中位生存期分别为21天和20天)相比,微孢子虫混合感染对蜜蜂生存的负面影响更大(中位生存期=15 - 17天),而对照蜜蜂的中位生存期为27天。我们发现,在混合感染中,两种微孢子虫的感染率(接种后有活跃感染的蜜蜂百分比)相似,蜜蜂微孢子虫的感染率略高(分别为91%和86%)。我们观察到,在单一微孢子虫感染中,感染东方蜜蜂微孢子虫的蜜蜂的孢子计数略高于感染蜜蜂微孢子虫的蜜蜂,尤其是在感染中期(第10天)。两种微孢子虫混合感染的蜜蜂的孢子计数高于单一感染的蜜蜂,但混合感染中的孢子计数变化很大。我们没有发现东方蜜蜂微孢子虫在混合感染中有竞争优势;蜜蜂微孢子虫的孢子计数要么更高,要么两种微孢子虫的计数相似,并且在62%接种了等量两种微孢子虫的蜜蜂中,产生的蜜蜂微孢子虫孢子更多。因此,东方蜜蜂微孢子虫似乎在感染性或孢子生长方面没有很强的宿主内优势,这表明在这些工蜂中肠内的直接竞争并不是其明显取代蜜蜂微孢子虫的原因。