Shiragami Makoto, Mizukami Akiko, Leeuwenkamp Oscar, Mrkvan Tomas, Delgleize Emmanuelle, Kurono Yuichi, Iwata Satoshi
Social and Administrative Pharmacy Science, School of Pharmacy, Nihon University, Funabashi-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Infect Dis Ther. 2014 Dec 20;4(1):93-112. doi: 10.1007/s40121-014-0053-7.
Diseases caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae represent a major public health problem. The purpose of this study was to compare, in the Japanese context, the projected health benefits, costs and cost-effectiveness of the latest generation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines which may provide important insight into the potential public health impact of interventions in the context of local disease-specific epidemiology.
A Markov model was used to compare two vaccination strategies which involve routine infant immunization with either the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-13; Prevenar 13™, Pfizer, Pearl River, NY, USA) or the 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV; Synflorix™, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA, Rixensart, Belgium) over a time horizon of 5 years from the healthcare provider and societal perspectives. Estimates for key model parameters were obtained from locally available databases and published literature. Incremental benefits in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life-year and cost-effectiveness were assessed.
A 3 + 1 vaccination schedule for infants with PHiD-CV is expected to have a similar impact on invasive pneumococcal disease and pneumonia and a larger impact on acute otitis media-related outcomes compared with PCV-13. Assuming price parity for these vaccines, the model projected that vaccination with PHiD-CV would result in cost savings of 1.9 and 3.9 billion Japanese yen from the provider and societal perspectives, respectively. This was largely due to a reduction in highly prevalent acute otitis media. Vaccination with PHiD-CV was expected to generate a gain of 433 quality-adjusted life-years compared to PCV-13 translating into dominance over PCV-13. Sensitivity analyses showed robustness of model outcome to changes in key model parameters and substantiated that the model outcome was consistently driven by the incremental benefit of PHiD-CV in averting acute otitis media.
In comparison to PCV-13, vaccination with PHiD-CV is projected to be cost saving for Japan from both the healthcare provider and societal perspectives.
肺炎链球菌引起的疾病是一个重大的公共卫生问题。本研究的目的是在日本的背景下,比较新一代肺炎球菌结合疫苗的预期健康效益、成本和成本效益,这可能为在当地疾病特异性流行病学背景下干预措施的潜在公共卫生影响提供重要见解。
采用马尔可夫模型,从医疗服务提供者和社会角度,比较两种疫苗接种策略,这两种策略涉及对婴儿进行常规免疫接种,分别接种13价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV-13;沛儿13™,辉瑞公司,美国纽约州珍珠河)或10价肺炎球菌非分型流感嗜血杆菌蛋白D结合疫苗(PHiD-CV;Synflorix™,葛兰素史克生物制品公司,比利时里克森萨特),时间跨度为5年。关键模型参数的估计值来自当地可用数据库和已发表的文献。评估了成本、质量调整生命年和成本效益方面的增量效益。
与PCV-13相比,婴儿接种PHiD-CV的3+1接种方案预计对侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病和肺炎有类似影响,对急性中耳炎相关结局有更大影响。假设这些疫苗价格持平,模型预测从医疗服务提供者和社会角度来看,接种PHiD-CV分别可节省19亿和39亿日元。这主要是由于高度流行的急性中耳炎减少。与PCV-13相比,接种PHiD-CV预计可增加433个质量调整生命年,从而优于PCV-13。敏感性分析表明模型结果对关键模型参数变化具有稳健性,并证实模型结果始终由PHiD-CV在预防急性中耳炎方面的增量效益驱动。
与PCV-13相比,从医疗服务提供者和社会角度来看,日本接种PHiD-CV预计可节省成本。