• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护中血栓栓塞预防的经济学评估试验(E-PROTECT):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Economic evaluation of the prophylaxis for thromboembolism in critical care trial (E-PROTECT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Fowler Robert A, Mittmann Nicole, Geerts William H, Heels-Ansdell Diane, Gould Michael K, Guyatt Gordon, Krahn Murray, Finfer Simon, Pinto Ruxandra, Chan Brian, Ormanidhi Orges, Arabi Yaseen, Qushmaq Ismael, Rocha Marcelo G, Dodek Peter, McIntyre Lauralyn, Hall Richard, Ferguson Niall D, Mehta Sangeeta, Marshall John C, Doig Christopher James, Muscedere John, Jacka Michael J, Klinger James R, Vlahakis Nicholas, Orford Neil, Seppelt Ian, Skrobik Yoanna K, Sud Sachin, Cade John F, Cooper Jamie, Cook Deborah

机构信息

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room D478, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.

Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, E240, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.

出版信息

Trials. 2014 Dec 20;15:502. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-502.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-15-502
PMID:25528663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4413997/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of critical illness with important clinical consequences. The Prophylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) is a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the two most common pharmocoprevention strategies, unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) dalteparin, in medical-surgical patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). E-PROTECT is a prospective and concurrent economic evaluation of the PROTECT trial.

METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective of E-PROTECT is to identify and quantify the total (direct and indirect, variable and fixed) costs associated with the management of critically ill patients participating in the PROTECT trial, and, to combine costs and outcome results to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of LMWH versus UFH, from the acute healthcare system perspective, over a data-rich time horizon of ICU admission and hospital admission. We derive baseline characteristics and probabilities of in-ICU and in-hospital events from all enrolled patients. Total costs are derived from centers, proportional to the numbers of patients enrolled in each country. Direct costs include medication, physician and other personnel costs, diagnostic radiology and laboratory testing, operative and non-operative procedures, costs associated with bleeding, transfusions and treatment-related complications. Indirect costs include ICU and hospital ward overhead costs. Outcomes are the ratio of incremental costs per incremental effects of LMWH versus UFH during hospitalization; incremental cost to prevent a thrombosis at any site (primary outcome); incremental cost to prevent a pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, major bleeding event or episode of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (secondary outcomes) and incremental cost per life-year gained (tertiary outcome). Pre-specified subgroups and sensitivity analyses will be performed and confidence intervals for the estimates of incremental cost-effectiveness will be obtained using bootstrapping.

DISCUSSION

This economic evaluation employs a prospective costing methodology concurrent with a randomized controlled blinded clinical trial, with a pre-specified analytic plan, outcome measures, subgroup and sensitivity analyses. This economic evaluation has received only peer-reviewed funding and funders will not play a role in the generation, analysis or decision to submit the manuscripts for publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00182143 . Date of registration: 10 September 2005.

摘要

背景

静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是危重症常见的并发症,具有重要的临床影响。重症监护中血栓栓塞预防试验(PROTECT)是一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验,比较了两种最常用的药物预防策略,即普通肝素(UFH)和低分子肝素(LMWH)达肝素,在重症监护病房(ICU)内科及外科患者中的有效性。E-PROTECT是对PROTECT试验进行的一项前瞻性同步经济评估。

方法/设计:E-PROTECT的主要目标是识别并量化与参与PROTECT试验的危重症患者管理相关的总(直接和间接、可变和固定)成本,并结合成本和结局结果,从急性医疗系统的角度,在一个数据丰富的ICU入院和医院入院时间范围内,确定低分子肝素相对于普通肝素的增量成本效益。我们从所有入组患者中得出基线特征以及ICU内和住院期间事件的概率。总成本来自各个中心,与每个国家入组的患者数量成比例。直接成本包括药物、医生及其他人员成本、诊断性放射学和实验室检查、手术及非手术操作、与出血、输血及治疗相关并发症有关的成本。间接成本包括ICU和医院病房的间接费用。结局指标为住院期间低分子肝素相对于普通肝素每增加一个效果的增量成本之比;预防任何部位血栓形成的增量成本(主要结局);预防肺栓塞、深静脉血栓形成、大出血事件或肝素诱导的血小板减少症发作的增量成本(次要结局)以及每获得一个生命年的增量成本(三级结局)。将进行预先指定的亚组分析和敏感性分析,并使用自抽样法获得增量成本效益估计值的置信区间。

讨论

这项经济评估采用了一种前瞻性成本核算方法,与一项随机对照双盲临床试验同步进行,具有预先指定的分析计划、结局指标、亚组分析和敏感性分析。这项经济评估仅获得了同行评审资金,资助者不会参与稿件的撰写、分析或决定投稿发表。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00182143。注册日期:2005年9月10日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca54/4413997/737e3805c0ef/13063_2014_2417_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca54/4413997/737e3805c0ef/13063_2014_2417_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca54/4413997/737e3805c0ef/13063_2014_2417_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of the prophylaxis for thromboembolism in critical care trial (E-PROTECT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.重症监护中血栓栓塞预防的经济学评估试验(E-PROTECT):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Dec 20;15:502. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-502.
2
Cost-effectiveness of dalteparin vs unfractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients.达肝素与未分级肝素预防危重症患者静脉血栓栓塞的成本效益比较。
JAMA. 2014 Nov 26;312(20):2135-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15101.
3
Economic impact of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a hospital perspective of the PREVAIL trial.依诺肝素与未分级肝素预防急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉血栓栓塞的经济学影响:来自 PREVAIL 试验的医院视角。
J Hosp Med. 2012 Mar;7(3):176-82. doi: 10.1002/jhm.968. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
4
Short-term therapy with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients: utilization study and cost-minimization analysis.住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症的短期依诺肝素或普通肝素治疗:利用研究和成本最小化分析。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5 Suppl 1):S89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.017.
5
Extended dalteparin prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic events: cost-utility analysis in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.达肝素延长预防静脉血栓栓塞事件:大型骨科手术患者的成本效益分析
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2009;9(1):45-58. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200909010-00005.
6
Competing Risk Analysis for Evaluation of Dalteparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism in Medical-Surgical Critically Ill Patients.比较达肝素与普通肝素用于内科-外科重症患者静脉血栓栓塞症的竞争风险分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(36):e1479. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001479.
7
Comparison of the two-year outcomes and costs of prophylaxis in medical patients at risk of venous thromboembolism.有静脉血栓栓塞风险的内科患者两年预防治疗的结局与成本比较。
Thromb Haemost. 2008 Nov;100(5):810-20.
8
PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial protocol and analysis plan.重症监护预防血栓栓塞试验方案和分析计划。
J Crit Care. 2011 Apr;26(2):223.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.02.010.
9
Out of hospital antithrombotic prophylaxis after total hip replacement: low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, aspirin or nothing? A cost-effectiveness analysis.全髋关节置换术后院外抗血栓预防:低分子量肝素、华法林、阿司匹林还是不进行预防?成本效益分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2002 Apr;87(4):586-92.
10
Cost-effectiveness of dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin as venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in malignant gynecologic surgery.达肝素与普通肝素在妇科恶性肿瘤手术中预防静脉血栓栓塞的成本效益分析
Am J Ther. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):512-5. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181727aa0.

引用本文的文献

1
Health economic evaluation alongside the Probiotics to Prevent Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial (E-PROSPECT): a cost-effectiveness analysis.益生菌预防重症肺炎和气管定植试验(E-PROSPECT)的卫生经济学评价:成本效果分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Dec;69(12):1515-1526. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02335-9. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
2
Cost-effectiveness of remdesivir plus usual care versus usual care alone for hospitalized patients with COVID-19: an economic evaluation as part of the Canadian Treatments for COVID-19 (CATCO) randomized clinical trial.瑞德西韦联合常规治疗与单纯常规治疗对 COVID-19 住院患者的成本效益:作为加拿大 COVID-19 治疗(CATCO)随机临床试验的一部分的经济评价。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Sep 6;10(3):E807-E817. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220077. Print 2022 Jul-Sep.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Economic analyses of venous thromboembolism prevention strategies in hospitalized patients: a systematic review.住院患者静脉血栓栓塞预防策略的经济分析:一项系统评价。
Crit Care. 2012 Mar 9;16(2):R43. doi: 10.1186/cc11241.
2
Low-molecular-weight heparin and mortality in acutely ill medical patients.低分子肝素与急症医疗患者的死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2463-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111288.
3
Screening and prevention of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients: a decision analysis and economic evaluation.
Economic evaluation alongside the Probiotics to Prevent Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial (E-PROSPECT): study protocol.经济评价与预防严重肺炎和气管定植的益生菌试验(E-PROSPECT)同时进行:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e036047. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036047.
4
Direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in critically ill patients: where do we go from here?用于危重症患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的直接口服抗凝剂:我们从这里何去何从?
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Apr;45(4):549-551. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05605-1. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
5
A multicentre controlled pre-post trial of an implementation science intervention to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in critically ill patients.一项改善重症患者静脉血栓栓塞症预防的实施科学干预的多中心对照前后试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Feb;45(2):211-222. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05532-1. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
危重症患者静脉血栓栓塞症的筛查与预防:决策分析与经济评价。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec 1;184(11):1289-98. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201106-1059OC. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
4
The direct medical costs associated with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.疑似肝素诱导的血小板减少症相关的直接医疗费用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jun;29(6):511-20. doi: 10.2165/11584330-000000000-00000.
5
Dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin in critically ill patients.达肝素与普通肝素在危重症患者中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1305-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014475. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
6
Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis.严重脓毒症幸存者的长期认知障碍和功能残疾。
JAMA. 2010 Oct 27;304(16):1787-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1553.
7
Measurement of quality of life using EQ-5D in patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation: comparison of patients, family caregivers, and nurses.使用 EQ-5D 量表对长期机械通气患者的生活质量进行测量:患者、家庭护理者和护士的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Jun;19(5):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9629-1. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
8
Quality of life in the five years after intensive care: a cohort study.重症监护五年后的生活质量:一项队列研究。
Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R6. doi: 10.1186/cc8848. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
9
Cost savings attributable to reductions in intensive care unit length of stay for mechanically ventilated patients.因机械通气患者重症监护病房住院时间缩短而产生的成本节约。
Med Care. 2008 Dec;46(12):1226-33. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817d9342.
10
Determinants of long-term survival after intensive care.重症监护后长期生存的决定因素。
Crit Care Med. 2008 May;36(5):1523-30. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318170a405.