Department of Psychology, Carleton University.
Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis, Canadian Armed Forces.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2015 Jul;20(3):338-47. doi: 10.1037/a0038559. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
The degree of overlap between two positive motivational constructs-morale and work engagement-was assessed in a random sample of Canadian Armed Forces personnel stationed across Canada (N = 1,224). Based on self-determination theory and past research, job-specific self-efficacy, trust in teammates, and job significance were expected to be associated with morale and work engagement. Structural equation modeling analyses revealed that morale and work engagement were highly positively correlated, but had different patterns of association with predictor and outcome variables. Although trust in teammates and job significance predicted both morale and work engagement, job-specific self-efficacy predicted morale but not work engagement. Willingness to deploy on operations, turnover intentions, and psychological distress were predicted by both morale and work engagement, but morale was a better predictor of psychological distress and work engagement was a stronger predictor of turnover intentions. Together, the results suggest that, despite their overlap, morale and work engagement, as defined and measured herein, are not interchangeable.
在加拿大各地驻扎的加拿大武装部队人员的随机样本中(N=1224),评估了两个积极动机结构——士气和工作投入——之间的重叠程度。基于自我决定理论和以往的研究,特定于工作的自我效能感、对队友的信任和工作意义预计与士气和工作投入有关。结构方程模型分析表明,士气和工作投入高度正相关,但与预测变量和结果变量的关联模式不同。虽然对队友的信任和工作意义都可以预测士气和工作投入,但特定于工作的自我效能感可以预测士气,但不能预测工作投入。愿意部署到行动中、离职意向和心理困扰都可以由士气和工作投入预测,但士气是心理困扰的更好预测指标,而工作投入是离职意向的更强预测指标。总的来说,研究结果表明,尽管士气和工作投入存在重叠,但在此处定义和测量的士气和工作投入并不能相互替代。