Dept. Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dept. Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51(3):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.11.020. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
Tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF) and melphalan based isolated limb perfusion (TM-ILP) is an attractive treatment option for advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS). This study reports on a 20-year single centre experience and discusses the evolution and changes in methodology since the introduction of TNF in ILP.
We performed 306 TM-ILPs in 275 patients with extremity STS. All patients were candidates for amputation or mutilating surgery in order to achieve local control. Clinical response evaluation consisted of clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. To evaluate the importance of TNF-dose, treatment results of two periods (1991-2003 high dose (3-4 mg) TNF; 2003-2012 reduced dose (1-2mg) TNF) were compared.
During the study period, more femoral perfusions were done instead of iliac perfusions. Reduction of TNF dose and reduction of total ILP time did not lead to different clinical response rates (70% and 69% for periods 1 and 2 respectively) or different local recurrence rates, but was associated with less local toxicity (23% and 14% for periods 1 and 2 respectively). Hospital stay was significantly reduced during the study period. There was an improved pathological response in the high dose TNF group without consequences for clinical outcome.
TM-ILP remains a very effective treatment modality for limb threatening extremity STS. Moreover, reduction of dose and the growing experience in ILP led to less local toxicity and shorter hospital stay.
肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF)和马法兰联合肢体隔离灌注(TM-ILP)是治疗晚期肢体软组织肉瘤(STS)的一种有吸引力的治疗选择。本研究报告了一个 20 年的单中心经验,并讨论了自 TNF 引入 ILP 以来方法的演变和变化。
我们对 275 名肢体 STS 患者进行了 306 次 TM-ILP。所有患者均为截肢或致残手术的候选者,以实现局部控制。临床反应评估包括临床检查和磁共振成像。为了评估 TNF 剂量的重要性,比较了两个时期(1991-2003 年高剂量(3-4mg)TNF;2003-2012 年低剂量(1-2mg)TNF)的治疗结果。
在研究期间,更多的股部灌注代替了髂部灌注。TNF 剂量的减少和总 ILP 时间的减少并没有导致不同的临床反应率(第 1 期和第 2 期分别为 70%和 69%)或不同的局部复发率,但与较低的局部毒性相关(第 1 期和第 2 期分别为 23%和 14%)。在研究期间,住院时间显著缩短。高剂量 TNF 组的病理反应得到改善,但对临床结果没有影响。
TM-ILP 仍然是治疗肢体威胁性肢体 STS 的一种非常有效的治疗方式。此外,剂量的减少和 ILP 经验的增加导致了较低的局部毒性和较短的住院时间。