Wilson Rebecca A A, Kolobe Thubi H A, Arnold Sandra H, McEwen Irene R
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015 Feb;35(1):40-53. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.975310. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
The purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity of the School Outcomes Measure (SOM) compared with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) in preschool-age children. This study also examined the consistency of children's motor performance across the home and school settings.
Five school-based physical therapists collected data on 44 preschool-age children with physical or combined physical and cognitive disability. Correlation coefficients analyzed the strength of association between SOM and PEDI subscale scores, while participant group mean scores analyzed agreement between measures regarding level of motor performance.
Correlations between homologous PEDI and SOM subscale scores varied from rs = .53 to rs = .92 supporting concurrent validity. With some exceptions, group mean SOM scores showed agreement with group mean PEDI scores when children were categorized by age, gross motor function level, or PEDI cutoff score (1 or 2 SD below the mean).
The results partially support concurrent validity between the SOM and PEDI, and suggest that the children's motor performance was similar across home and school settings. The findings also suggest that as a minimal database the SOM can reliably assess motor performance in the school setting; the disadvantage is difficulty interpreting SOM scores.
本研究旨在检验学龄前儿童中学校成果测量(SOM)与儿童残疾评定量表(PEDI)相比的同时效度。本研究还考察了儿童在家庭和学校环境中运动表现的一致性。
五名学校物理治疗师收集了44名患有身体残疾或身体与认知合并残疾的学龄前儿童的数据。相关系数分析了SOM与PEDI分量表得分之间的关联强度,而参与者组平均得分分析了测量指标在运动表现水平方面的一致性。
PEDI与SOM同源分量表得分之间的相关性从rs = 0.53到rs = 0.92不等,支持同时效度。除了一些例外情况,当根据年龄对儿童进行分类时,SOM组平均得分与PEDI组平均得分一致,或根据粗大运动功能水平或PEDI临界值得分(低于平均值1或2个标准差)。
结果部分支持SOM与PEDI之间的同时效度,并表明儿童在家庭和学校环境中的运动表现相似。研究结果还表明,作为一个最小数据库,SOM可以可靠地评估学校环境中的运动表现;缺点是难以解释SOM得分。