Kothari Dhari H, Haley Stephen M, Gill-Body Kathleen M, Dumas Helene M
VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Center, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Phys Ther. 2003 Sep;83(9):776-85.
The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) subscales are hierarchic in nature, with item placements within each subscale reflecting the general order of skill attainment in children without disabilities. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a hierarchical subscale developed in this study for children with acquired brain injuries (ABIs) corresponds to the generic PEDI subscales, and, if not, whether condition-specific (ABI-specific) PEDI subscales are more sensitive for measuring change.
Eighty-seven children and adolescents (mean age=9.2 years, SD=5.2, range=1-20) with ABI during inpatient rehabilitation admissions were included.
Data were collected by retrospective chart review. Rasch one-parameter analyses were conducted to construct the ABI-specific PEDI scale focusing on the Mobility and Self-care domains (content areas) only. Each domain consists of a Functional Skills subscale and a Caregiver Assistance subscale. Thus, in all, 4 scales were constructed within the ABI-specific PEDI scale. Differences in item hierarchies and sensitivity between generic and ABI-specific PEDI subscales for each domain were then examined.
Both generic and ABI-specific PEDI scales were sensitive for measuring functional changes during inpatient rehabilitation hospitalization. Even though the generic and ABI-specific item hierarchies differed substantially, only one of the 4 ABI-specific PEDI subscales (Caregiver Assistance Self-care subscale) was more sensitive for measuring change than the generic PEDI scale.
The ABI-specific scales added relatively little improvement in sensitivity compared with the generic PEDI scales of the Mobility and Self-care domains. Thus, for group analyses, the authors recommend use of the generic PEDI subscales for children with ABI. Future work with ABI-specific subscales may improve the physical therapist's ability to describe an individual's pattern of functional recovery.
儿童残疾评定量表(PEDI)的分量表本质上具有层级性,每个分量表中的项目排列反映了无残疾儿童技能获得的一般顺序。本研究的目的是确定本研究中为获得性脑损伤(ABI)儿童开发的层级分量表是否与通用的PEDI分量表相对应,如果不对应,特定病情(ABI特异性)的PEDI分量表在测量变化方面是否更敏感。
纳入了87名在住院康复期间患有ABI的儿童和青少年(平均年龄=9.2岁,标准差=5.2,范围=1-20岁)。
通过回顾性病历审查收集数据。进行Rasch单参数分析,以构建仅关注运动和自我照顾领域(内容领域)的ABI特异性PEDI量表。每个领域由一个功能技能分量表和一个照顾者协助分量表组成。因此,在ABI特异性PEDI量表中总共构建了4个量表。然后检查每个领域通用和ABI特异性PEDI分量表在项目层级和敏感性方面的差异。
通用和ABI特异性PEDI量表在测量住院康复期间的功能变化方面均很敏感。尽管通用和ABI特异性项目层级有很大差异,但4个ABI特异性PEDI分量表中只有1个(照顾者协助自我照顾分量表)在测量变化方面比通用PEDI量表更敏感。
与运动和自我照顾领域的通用PEDI量表相比,ABI特异性量表在敏感性方面的改善相对较小。因此,对于组分析,作者建议对患有ABI的儿童使用通用的PEDI分量表。未来针对ABI特异性分量表的工作可能会提高物理治疗师描述个体功能恢复模式的能力。