Benyounes Nadia, Lang Sylvie, Soulat-Dufour Laurie, Obadia Michaël, Gout Olivier, Chevalier Gisèle, Cohen Ariel
Cardiology Unit, Fondation A. de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Department of Cardiology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Jan;108(1):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the most commonly used method for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but its reproducibility remains a matter of controversy. Speckle tracking echocardiography assesses myocardial deformation and left ventricular systolic function by measuring global longitudinal strain (GLS), which is more reproducible, but is not used routinely in hospital practice.
To investigate the feasibility of on-line two-dimensional GLS in predicting LVEF during routine echocardiographic practice.
The analysis involved 507 unselected consecutive patients undergoing TTE between August 2012 and November 2013. Echocardiograms were performed by a single sonographer. Echogenicity was noted as good, moderate or poor. Simple linear regression was used to assess the relationship between LVEF and GLS, overall and according to quality of echogenicity. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to identify the threshold GLS that predicts LVEF≤40%.
Mean LVEF was 64±11% and GLS was -18.0±4.0%. A reasonable correlation was found between LVEF and GLS (r=-0.53; P<0.001), which was improved when echogenicity was good (r=-0.60; P<0.001). GLS explained 28.1% of the variation in LVEF, and for one unit decrease in GLS, a 1.45 unit increase in LVEF was expected. Correlations between LVEF and GLS were -0.51 for patients in sinus rhythm (n=490) and -0.86 in atrial fibrillation (n=17). Based on ROC analysis, the area under the curve was 0.97 for GLS≥-14%, allowing detection of LVEF≤40% with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 86%.
Two-dimensional GLS is easy to obtain and accurately detects LVEF≤40% in unselected patients. GLS may be especially helpful when a suboptimal acoustic window makes LVEF measurement by Simpson's biplane method difficult and in atrial fibrillation patients with low heart rate variability.
经胸超声心动图(TTE)是测量左心室射血分数(LVEF)最常用的方法,但其可重复性仍存在争议。斑点追踪超声心动图通过测量整体纵向应变(GLS)来评估心肌变形和左心室收缩功能,其可重复性更高,但在医院实践中未被常规使用。
探讨在常规超声心动图检查中在线二维GLS预测LVEF的可行性。
分析纳入了2012年8月至2013年11月期间连续接受TTE检查的507例未经选择的患者。超声心动图由一名超声检查医师进行。将回声强度记录为良好、中等或较差。采用简单线性回归分析整体以及根据回声强度质量评估LVEF与GLS之间的关系。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析确定预测LVEF≤40%的GLS阈值。
平均LVEF为64±11%,GLS为-18.0±4.0%。LVEF与GLS之间存在合理的相关性(r=-0.53;P<),当回声强度良好时相关性有所改善(r=-0.60;P<)。GLS解释了LVEF变异的28.1%,GLS每降低一个单位,预计LVEF会增加1.45个单位。窦性心律患者(n=490)中LVEF与GLS的相关性为-0.51,房颤患者(n=17)中为-0.86。基于ROC分析,GLS≥-14%时曲线下面积为0.97,检测LVEF≤40%的灵敏度为95%,特异度为86%。
二维GLS易于获得,且能准确检测未经选择患者中LVEF≤40%的情况。当声学窗口欠佳导致难以用双平面辛普森法测量LVEF时,以及在心率变异性较低的房颤患者中,GLS可能特别有用。