Suppr超能文献

斑点追踪技术测定二尖瓣组织瓣环位移:与应变及射血分数的比较,以及与血液透析患者预后的相关性

Speckle tracking determination of mitral tissue annular displacement: comparison with strain and ejection fraction, and association with outcomes in haemodialysis patients.

作者信息

Chiu Diana Y Y, Abidin Nik, Hughes John, Sinha Smeeta, Kalra Philip A, Green Darren

机构信息

Vascular Research Group, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.

Department of Renal Medicine, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Oct;32(10):1511-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0946-5. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

Abstract

Abnormal Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are established poor prognostic risk factors in haemodialysis patients. Tissue motion annular displacement of mitral valve annulus (TMAD), determined by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), can be performed rapidly and is an indicator of systolic dysfunction, but has been less well explored. This study aims to compare TMAD with GLS and LVEF and its association with outcomes in haemodialysis patients. 198 haemodialysis patients (median age 64.2 years, 69 % men) had 2D echocardiography, with STE determined GLS and TMAD. Bland-Altman analysis and linear regression assessed relationship between GLS, LVEF and TMAD. Cox regression analysis investigated association of TMAD with mortality and cardiac events. TMAD had low inter- and intra-observer variability with small biases and narrow limits of agreement (LOA) (bias of -0.01 ± 1.32 (95 % LOA was -2.60 to 2.58) and -0.07 ± 1.27 (95 % LOA -2.55 to 2.41) respectively). There was a moderate negative correlation between GLS and LVEF (r = -0.383, p < 0.001) and a weak positive correlation between TMAD and LVEF (r = 0.248, p < 0.001). There was strong negative correlation of TMAD with GLS (r = -0.614, p < 0.001). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, TMAD was not associated with mortality (HR 1.04, 95 % CI 0.91-1.19), cardiac death (HR 1.03, 95 % CI 0.80-1.32) or cardiac events (HR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.80-1.02). TMAD is a quick and reproducible alternative to GLS which may be very useful in cardiovascular risk assessment, but does not have the same prognostic value in HD patients as GLS.

摘要

异常的整体纵向应变(GLS)和降低的左心室射血分数(LVEF)是血液透析患者公认的不良预后危险因素。通过斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)测定的二尖瓣环组织运动环形位移(TMAD)可以快速进行,是收缩功能障碍的一个指标,但尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在比较TMAD与GLS和LVEF及其与血液透析患者预后的关系。198例血液透析患者(中位年龄64.2岁,69%为男性)接受了二维超声心动图检查,通过STE测定GLS和TMAD。Bland-Altman分析和线性回归评估了GLS、LVEF和TMAD之间的关系。Cox回归分析研究了TMAD与死亡率和心脏事件的关联。TMAD在观察者间和观察者内的变异性较低,偏差较小,一致性界限(LOA)较窄(偏差分别为-0.01±1.32(95%LOA为-2.60至2.58)和-0.07±1.27(95%LOA为-2.55至2.41))。GLS与LVEF之间存在中度负相关(r = -0.383,p < 0.001),TMAD与LVEF之间存在弱正相关(r = 0.248,p < 0.001)。TMAD与GLS存在强负相关(r = -0.614,p < 0.001)。在多变量Cox回归分析中,TMAD与死亡率(HR 1.04,95%CI 0.91-1.19)、心源性死亡(HR 1.03,95%CI 0.80-1.32)或心脏事件(HR 0.91,95%CI 0.80-1.02)无关。TMAD是GLS的一种快速且可重复的替代方法,在心血管风险评估中可能非常有用,但在血液透析患者中,其预后价值与GLS不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验