• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康领域沟通评估清单(CATCH):一种评估临床医生印刷教育材料质量的工具。

The Communication AssessmenT Checklist in Health (CATCH): a tool for assessing the quality of printed educational materials for clinicians.

作者信息

Genova Juliana, Nahon-Serfaty Isaac, Dansokho Selma Chipenda, Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Renaud Jean-Sébastien, Giguère Anik M C

出版信息

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2014 Fall;34(4):232-42. doi: 10.1002/chp.21257.

DOI:10.1002/chp.21257
PMID:25530293
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is little guidance available on strategies to improve the communication quality of printed educational materials (PEMs) for clinicians. The purposes of this study were to conceptualize PEM communication quality, develop a checklist based on this conceptualization, and validate the checklist with a selection of PEMs.

METHODS

From a literature review of the strategies influencing communication quality, we generated a conceptual map and developed the Communication AssessmenT Checklist in Health (CATCH) consisting of 55 items nested in 12 concepts. Two raters independently applied CATCH to 45 PEMs evaluated in the studies included in a Cochrane systematic review. From these results, we conducted an item analysis and assessed content validity of CATCH using a hierarchical cluster analysis to explore the extent to which our CATCH operationalization truly represented the communication quality concepts.

RESULTS

Some concepts were better covered in the studied PEMs, whereas others were not covered consistently. We observed 3 contrasting PEM clusters. A first cluster (n = 22) was characterized by longer PEMs and comprised mostly high-impact peer-reviewed scientific articles or clinical practice guidelines. A second cluster (n = 22) consisted of PEMs shorter than 4 pages that used special fonts, color, pictures, and graphics. A third cluster consisted of a single brief PEM.

DISCUSSION

With CATCH it is possible to categorize and understand the mechanisms that can trigger a change in behavior in health care providers. Additional research is needed to validate CATCH before it can be recommended for use.

摘要

引言

关于提高临床医生印刷教育材料(PEMs)沟通质量的策略,几乎没有可用的指导。本研究的目的是对PEM沟通质量进行概念化,基于这一概念化开发一份清单,并用一系列PEMs对该清单进行验证。

方法

通过对影响沟通质量策略的文献综述,我们绘制了一个概念图,并开发了健康沟通评估清单(CATCH),该清单由嵌套在12个概念中的55个项目组成。两名评分者独立将CATCH应用于Cochrane系统评价中纳入研究的45份PEMs。根据这些结果,我们进行了项目分析,并使用层次聚类分析评估CATCH的内容效度,以探讨我们对CATCH的操作化在多大程度上真正代表了沟通质量概念。

结果

在所研究的PEMs中,有些概念得到了较好的涵盖,而其他概念则没有得到一致的涵盖。我们观察到3个不同的PEM聚类。第一个聚类(n = 22)的特点是PEMs较长,主要包括高影响力的同行评审科学文章或临床实践指南。第二个聚类(n = 22)由少于4页的PEMs组成,这些PEMs使用了特殊字体、颜色、图片和图形。第三个聚类由一份简短的PEM组成。

讨论

使用CATCH可以对可能引发医疗保健提供者行为改变的机制进行分类和理解。在推荐使用CATCH之前,还需要进行更多研究以验证其有效性。

相似文献

1
The Communication AssessmenT Checklist in Health (CATCH): a tool for assessing the quality of printed educational materials for clinicians.健康领域沟通评估清单(CATCH):一种评估临床医生印刷教育材料质量的工具。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2014 Fall;34(4):232-42. doi: 10.1002/chp.21257.
2
Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.印刷教育材料:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004398.pub3.
3
Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.印刷教育材料:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD004398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004398.pub2.
4
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
7
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
8
Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians.旨在改善卫生系统管理人员、政策制定者和临床医生在决策过程中对系统评价的使用情况的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009401.pub2.
9
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
10
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.