Genova Juliana, Nahon-Serfaty Isaac, Dansokho Selma Chipenda, Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Renaud Jean-Sébastien, Giguère Anik M C
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2014 Fall;34(4):232-42. doi: 10.1002/chp.21257.
There is little guidance available on strategies to improve the communication quality of printed educational materials (PEMs) for clinicians. The purposes of this study were to conceptualize PEM communication quality, develop a checklist based on this conceptualization, and validate the checklist with a selection of PEMs.
From a literature review of the strategies influencing communication quality, we generated a conceptual map and developed the Communication AssessmenT Checklist in Health (CATCH) consisting of 55 items nested in 12 concepts. Two raters independently applied CATCH to 45 PEMs evaluated in the studies included in a Cochrane systematic review. From these results, we conducted an item analysis and assessed content validity of CATCH using a hierarchical cluster analysis to explore the extent to which our CATCH operationalization truly represented the communication quality concepts.
Some concepts were better covered in the studied PEMs, whereas others were not covered consistently. We observed 3 contrasting PEM clusters. A first cluster (n = 22) was characterized by longer PEMs and comprised mostly high-impact peer-reviewed scientific articles or clinical practice guidelines. A second cluster (n = 22) consisted of PEMs shorter than 4 pages that used special fonts, color, pictures, and graphics. A third cluster consisted of a single brief PEM.
With CATCH it is possible to categorize and understand the mechanisms that can trigger a change in behavior in health care providers. Additional research is needed to validate CATCH before it can be recommended for use.
关于提高临床医生印刷教育材料(PEMs)沟通质量的策略,几乎没有可用的指导。本研究的目的是对PEM沟通质量进行概念化,基于这一概念化开发一份清单,并用一系列PEMs对该清单进行验证。
通过对影响沟通质量策略的文献综述,我们绘制了一个概念图,并开发了健康沟通评估清单(CATCH),该清单由嵌套在12个概念中的55个项目组成。两名评分者独立将CATCH应用于Cochrane系统评价中纳入研究的45份PEMs。根据这些结果,我们进行了项目分析,并使用层次聚类分析评估CATCH的内容效度,以探讨我们对CATCH的操作化在多大程度上真正代表了沟通质量概念。
在所研究的PEMs中,有些概念得到了较好的涵盖,而其他概念则没有得到一致的涵盖。我们观察到3个不同的PEM聚类。第一个聚类(n = 22)的特点是PEMs较长,主要包括高影响力的同行评审科学文章或临床实践指南。第二个聚类(n = 22)由少于4页的PEMs组成,这些PEMs使用了特殊字体、颜色、图片和图形。第三个聚类由一份简短的PEM组成。
使用CATCH可以对可能引发医疗保健提供者行为改变的机制进行分类和理解。在推荐使用CATCH之前,还需要进行更多研究以验证其有效性。