Yang Xi Jessie, Park Taezoon, Siah Tien Ho Kewin, Ang Bee Leng Sophia, Donchin Yoel
Department of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Soongsil University, 369SangdoRo Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Singapore Med J. 2015 Feb;56(2):109-15. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014198.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the challenges faced by physicians during shift handovers in a university hospital that has a high handover sender/recipient ratio.
A multifaceted approach was adopted, comprising recording and analysis of handover information, rating of handover quality, and shadowing of handover recipients. Data was collected at the general medical ward of a university hospital in Singapore for a period of three months. Handover information transfer (i.e. senders' and recipients' verbal communication, and recipients' handwritten notes) and handover environmental factors were analysed. The relationship between 'to-do' tasks, and information transfer, handover quality and handover duration, were examined using analysis of variance.
Verbal handovers for 152 patients were observed; handwritten notes on 102 (67.1%) patients and handover quality ratings for the handovers of 98 (64.5%) patients were collected. Although there was good task prioritisation (information transfer: p < 0.005, handover duration: p < 0.01), incomplete information transfer and poor implementation of nonmodifiable identifiers were observed. The high sender/recipient ratio of the hospital made face-to-face and/or bedside handover difficult to implement. Although the current handover method (i.e. use of telephone communication), allowed interactive communication, it resulted in systemic information loss due to the lack of written information. The handover environment was chaotic in the high sender/recipient ratio setting, and the physicians had no designated handover time or location.
Handovers in high sender/recipient ratio settings are challenging. Efforts should be made to improve the handover processes in such situations, so that patient care is not compromised.
本研究的目的是调查在一所交接发送者/接收者比例较高的大学医院中,医生在轮班交接期间所面临的挑战。
采用了多方面的方法,包括记录和分析交接信息、评估交接质量以及跟随交接接收者。在新加坡一所大学医院的普通内科病房收集了为期三个月的数据。分析了交接信息传递(即发送者和接收者的口头交流以及接收者的手写笔记)和交接环境因素。使用方差分析检查了“待办”任务与信息传递、交接质量和交接持续时间之间的关系。
观察了152例患者的口头交接;收集了102例(67.1%)患者的手写笔记以及98例(64.5%)患者交接的质量评估。尽管任务优先级划分良好(信息传递:p < 0.005,交接持续时间:p < 0.01),但仍观察到信息传递不完整以及不可修改标识符的实施不佳。该医院较高的发送者/接收者比例使得面对面和/或床边交接难以实施。尽管当前的交接方法(即使用电话通信)允许进行交互式交流,但由于缺乏书面信息,导致系统性信息丢失。在发送者/接收者比例较高的情况下,交接环境混乱,医生没有指定的交接时间或地点。
在发送者/接收者比例较高的情况下进行交接具有挑战性。应努力改善这种情况下的交接流程,以免影响患者护理。