Smirnova Anna, Zorina Zoya, Obozova Tanya, Wasserman Edward
Department of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119899, Russia.
Department of Psychology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Curr Biol. 2015 Jan 19;25(2):256-260. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.063. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
Analogical reasoning is vital to advanced cognition and behavioral adaptation. Many theorists deem analogical thinking to be uniquely human and to be foundational to categorization, creative problem solving, and scientific discovery. Comparative psychologists have long been interested in the species generality of analogical reasoning, but they initially found it difficult to obtain empirical support for such thinking in nonhuman animals (for pioneering efforts, see [2, 3]). Researchers have since mustered considerable evidence and argument that relational matching-to-sample (RMTS) effectively captures the essence of analogy, in which the relevant logical arguments are presented visually. In RMTS, choice of test pair BB would be correct if the sample pair were AA, whereas choice of test pair EF would be correct if the sample pair were CD. Critically, no items in the correct test pair physically match items in the sample pair, thus demanding that only relational sameness or differentness is available to support accurate choice responding. Initial evidence suggested that only humans and apes can successfully learn RMTS with pairs of sample and test items; however, monkeys have subsequently done so. Here, we report that crows too exhibit relational matching behavior. Even more importantly, crows spontaneously display relational responding without ever having been trained on RMTS; they had only been trained on identity matching-to-sample (IMTS). Such robust and uninstructed relational matching behavior represents the most convincing evidence yet of analogical reasoning in a nonprimate species, as apes alone have spontaneously exhibited RMTS behavior after only IMTS training.
类比推理对于高级认知和行为适应至关重要。许多理论家认为类比思维是人类独有的,是分类、创造性问题解决和科学发现的基础。比较心理学家长期以来一直对类比推理的物种普遍性感兴趣,但他们最初发现很难在非人类动物中获得这种思维的实证支持(关于开创性的研究,见[2, 3])。此后,研究人员收集了大量证据和论据,表明关系匹配样本(RMTS)有效地捕捉了类比的本质,其中相关的逻辑论据以视觉方式呈现。在RMTS中,如果样本对是AA,那么选择测试对BB就是正确的;而如果样本对是CD,那么选择测试对EF就是正确的。至关重要的是,正确测试对中的任何项目在物理上都与样本对中的项目不匹配,因此要求只有关系的相同或不同才能支持准确的选择反应。初步证据表明,只有人类和猿类能够成功地学习样本对和测试对的RMTS;然而,猴子后来也做到了。在这里,我们报告乌鸦也表现出关系匹配行为。更重要的是,乌鸦在从未接受过RMTS训练的情况下自发地表现出关系反应;它们只接受过样本身份匹配(IMTS)训练。这种强大的、无指导的关系匹配行为是迄今为止非灵长类物种中类比推理最有说服力的证据,因为只有猿类在仅接受IMTS训练后自发地表现出RMTS行为。