Kreshak Allyson A, Wardi Gabriel, Tomaszewski Christian A
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, California.
J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;48(3):382-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
Emergency Department (ED) medication lists (ML) are considered inaccurate based on previous comparisons of ED ML with patients' self-reporting of medications and reviews of patients' pharmacy and medical records.
To determine the accuracy of ED ML using mass spectrometry analysis of urine samples.
This was a prospective observational study conducted at an urban tertiary care university hospital. Convenience sampling of patients who underwent ED triage was done. Included were patients 18 years or older who were capable of providing informed consent and who reported use of at least one medication. Excluded were patients unable to consent, prisoners, non-English-speaking patients, and patients unwilling or unable to provide a urine sample. Mass spectrometry analysis was performed on enrolled patients' urine, and their ED triage ML were recorded. Urinalysis results were compared to ED triage ML. Concordance between respective ED triage ML and urinalysis results was determined. Medications were grouped by medication class. The top five discrepant medication classes were identified.
There were 100 patients enrolled; 21 patients, although eligible, did not provide a urine sample and were excluded, and one patient withdrew. Mean age was 51 years, and 54 patients were male. Twenty-two medication classes were identified. No patient had 100% concordance of ED triage ML and urinalysis results. Opioid analgesic, sedative hypnotics, cardiac, psychiatric, and nonopioid analgesic medications were the top discrepant medication classes.
ED triage ML obtained by patient recall are inaccurate when compared to medications detected in urine using mass spectrometry analysis.
根据先前急诊科用药清单(ML)与患者自我报告的用药情况以及患者药房和病历审查的比较,急诊科用药清单被认为不准确。
通过对尿液样本进行质谱分析来确定急诊科用药清单的准确性。
这是一项在城市三级大学医院进行的前瞻性观察性研究。对接受急诊科分诊的患者进行便利抽样。纳入的患者年龄在18岁及以上,能够提供知情同意书且报告使用过至少一种药物。排除的患者包括无法同意的患者、囚犯、非英语患者以及不愿意或无法提供尿液样本的患者。对入选患者的尿液进行质谱分析,并记录他们的急诊科分诊用药清单。将尿液分析结果与急诊科分诊用药清单进行比较。确定各自的急诊科分诊用药清单与尿液分析结果之间的一致性。药物按药物类别分组。确定了差异最大的前五类药物。
共纳入100名患者;21名患者虽符合条件但未提供尿液样本而被排除,1名患者退出。平均年龄为51岁,54名患者为男性。确定了22类药物。没有患者的急诊科分诊用药清单与尿液分析结果完全一致。阿片类镇痛药、镇静催眠药、心脏用药、精神科用药和非阿片类镇痛药是差异最大的药物类别。
与使用质谱分析在尿液中检测到的药物相比,通过患者回忆获得的急诊科分诊用药清单不准确。