Farahani Mohammad N, De Raad Boele, Farzad Valiolla, Fotoohie Mahmood
Department of Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Heymans Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Int J Psychol. 2016 Apr;51(2):139-49. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12133. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
We described the development of a taxonomy of Persian personality-descriptive terms in two studies. In Study 1, judges scanned Persian dictionaries and several Persian novels for person-descriptive terms. The resulting set of person-descriptive terms was classified into different categories of description, including the category of dispositional trait-descriptive adjectives. Of the 544 most familiar traits, 126 traits were selected to collect self-ratings. In Study 2, self-ratings were provided by 2400 students. Ratings were factor analysed (Principal Components Analysis) followed by Varimax rotation. Factor structures with two to six factors were discussed. The two-factor structure and the three-factor structure confirm the Big Two and the Big Three, respectively. Of the structures with five and six factors, the five-factor structure appears to be the more appropriate choice, with the factors labelled Morality, Positive versus Negative Emotionality, Achievement, Thoughtfulness and Affection. Gender differences were measured on both the five-factor structure and the six-factor structure. The discussion section emphasised both cross-cultural commonalities and cultural deviations in reference to the Big Five.
我们在两项研究中描述了波斯语人格描述术语分类法的发展。在研究1中,评判者查阅了波斯语词典和几本波斯语小说以获取人格描述术语。由此产生的人格描述术语集被分类到不同的描述类别中,包括特质描述性形容词类别。在544个最常见的特质中,选择了126个特质来收集自我评定。在研究2中,2400名学生提供了自我评定。评定结果进行了因子分析(主成分分析),随后进行了方差最大化旋转。讨论了二因素结构到六因素结构。二因素结构和三因素结构分别证实了“大二元”和“大三元”。在五因素结构和六因素结构中,五因素结构似乎是更合适的选择,其因素分别标记为道德、积极与消极情绪、成就、体贴和情感。在五因素结构和六因素结构上都测量了性别差异。讨论部分强调了与大五人格相关的跨文化共性和文化差异。