• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在人格属性结构中分离描述与评价。

Separating description and evaluation in the structure of personality attributes.

作者信息

Saucier G

机构信息

Division of Counseling Psychology, University of Oregon.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Jan;66(1):141-54. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.141.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.141
PMID:8126644
Abstract

Personality attributes typically combine descriptive and evaluative aspects, as do most personality constructs and the factors in the Big Five taxonomy. However, an auxiliary representation, in which the descriptive and evaluative aspects are clearly separated, has technological utility in some areas of research and assessment. D. Peabody and H. G. Gough independently developed structural models of this type, each with 3 dimensions. Studies used a multiple-method, multiple-replication approach, with data sets involving a large, representative set of familiar personality adjectives, to uncover a structure with 5 orthogonal dimensions, 4 descriptive and 1 highly evaluative, easily measurable with adjective scales. These dimensions demonstrated a complex relation to previous Peabody factors and to the Big Five, and they may be useful in integrating some venerable constructs into the structure of personality attributes.

摘要

人格特质通常将描述性和评价性方面结合在一起,大多数人格结构和大五人格分类法中的因素也是如此。然而,一种将描述性和评价性方面清晰分开的辅助表征,在某些研究和评估领域具有技术实用性。D. 皮博迪和H. G. 高夫独立开发了这种类型的结构模型,每个模型都有三个维度。研究采用了多方法、多重复的方法,数据集涉及大量具有代表性的常见人格形容词,以揭示一个具有五个正交维度的结构,其中四个是描述性的,一个是高度评价性的,使用形容词量表很容易测量。这些维度与之前的皮博迪因素和大五人格显示出复杂的关系,它们可能有助于将一些古老的结构整合到人格特质的结构中。

相似文献

1
Separating description and evaluation in the structure of personality attributes.在人格属性结构中分离描述与评价。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Jan;66(1):141-54. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.141.
2
Extending the search for folk personality constructs: the dimensionality of the personality-relevant proverb domain.拓展对民间人格结构的探索:与人格相关的谚语领域的维度
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Apr;82(4):594-609.
3
The non-evaluative circumplex of personality adjectives.人格形容词的非评价性环形模型。
J Pers. 2001 Aug;69(4):537-82. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.694155.
4
An evaluation of evaluative personality terms: a comparison of the big seven and five-factor model in predicting psychopathology.评价性人格术语的评估:大七人格模型和五因素模型在预测精神病理学方面的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2005 Sep;17(3):359-68. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.359.
5
A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives.对1710个英语人格描述形容词的层次分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):707-21. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.707.
6
Higher order factors of personality: do they exist?人格的高阶因素:它们存在吗?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009 May;13(2):79-91. doi: 10.1177/1088868309338467. Epub 2009 May 20.
7
The lexical approach to the study of personality structure: toward the identification of cross-culturally replicable dimensions of personality variation.人格结构研究的词汇学方法:迈向识别跨文化可复制的人格变异维度。
J Pers Disord. 2005 Jun;19(3):303-8. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.3.303.
8
Assessing the five-factor model of personality description.评估人格描述的五因素模型。
J Pers. 1992 Jun;60(2):253-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00974.x.
9
Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure.大五人格与环形模型方法在特质结构研究中的整合
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Jul;63(1):146-63. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.1.146.
10
Using the five-factor model to identify a new personality disorder domain: the case for experiential permeability.运用五因素模型识别一种新的人格障碍领域:经验渗透性的案例
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;96(6):1245-58. doi: 10.1037/a0015368.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling interpersonal perception in dyadic interactions: towards robot-assisted social mediation in the real world.二元互动中的人际感知建模:迈向现实世界中的机器人辅助社会调解
Front Robot AI. 2024 Nov 28;11:1410957. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1410957. eCollection 2024.
2
Using the multidimensional nominal response model to model faking in questionnaire data: The importance of item desirability characteristics.使用多维名义反应模型对问卷数据中的伪造进行建模:项目期望特征的重要性。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8869-8896. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02509-x. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
Associations of the Big Five and locus of control with problem gambling in a large Australian sample.
大五人格和控制源与澳大利亚大样本中赌博问题的关联。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 14;16(6):e0253046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253046. eCollection 2021.
4
Is Healthy Neuroticism Associated with Longevity? A Coordinated Integrative Data Analysis.健康的神经质与长寿有关吗?一项协同综合数据分析。
Collabra Psychol. 2020;6(1). doi: 10.1525/collabra.268. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
5
The Properties and Utility of Less Evaluative Personality Scales: Reduction of Social Desirability; Increase of Construct and Discriminant Validity.较少评价性人格量表的性质与效用:降低社会赞许性;提高结构效度和区分效度。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 27;11:560271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560271. eCollection 2020.
6
Culture, morality and individual differences: comparability and incomparability across species.文化、道德与个体差异:物种间的可比性与不可比性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 19;373(1744). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0170.
7
Item Selection, Evaluation, and Simple Structure in Personality Data.人格数据中的项目选择、评估与简单结构
J Res Pers. 2010 Aug 1;44(4):407-420. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.03.002.