Burtăverde Vlad, De Raad Boele
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Int J Psychol. 2019 Jun;54(3):377-387. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12464. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
We identified 1746 personality-relevant trait-adjectives in a Romanian dictionary, of which 412 were classified as descriptors of dispositions by 10 judges. Self-ratings were collected from 515 participants on those 412 adjectives, and the ratings were factored using principal components analysis. Solutions with different numbers of factors were analysed. The two- and three-factor solutions, respectively, confirmed the Big Two and Big Three of personality traits. A five-factor solution reflected the Big Five model with a fifth factor emphasising Rebelliousness versus Conventionality. The five-factor solution was related to the International Personality Item Pool-Big Five scales, and the highest correlations were indeed between the corresponding factors and scales. A six-factor solution was indicative of the six-factor model as expressed in the HEXACO model, yet with a weak Honesty-Humility factor. Additional analysis with self-ratings from 218 participants on marker-scales for the six-factor solution and on the six scales of the HEXACO did not produce a clear one-to-one correspondence between the two sets of scales, confirming indeed that the six-factor model was only partially found.
我们在一本罗马尼亚语词典中确定了1746个与人格相关的特质形容词,其中412个被10名评判员归类为性格描述词。我们收集了515名参与者对这412个形容词的自我评定,并使用主成分分析法对评定结果进行了因子分析。我们分析了具有不同因子数量的解决方案。两因子和三因子解决方案分别证实了人格特质的大二因素模型和大三因素模型。五因子解决方案反映了大五人格模型,其中第五个因子强调叛逆与传统。五因子解决方案与国际人格项目池-大五人格量表相关,且相应因子与量表之间的相关性确实最高。六因子解决方案表明了HEXACO模型中所表达的六因子模型,但诚实-谦逊因子较弱。对218名参与者在六因子解决方案的标记量表和HEXACO的六个量表上的自我评定进行的额外分析并未在两组量表之间产生明确的一一对应关系,确实证实了六因子模型只是部分被发现。