Suppr超能文献

与动静脉内瘘相比,中心静脉狭窄在接受透析移植血管的患者中更易出现症状。

Central venous stenosis is more often symptomatic in hemodialysis patients with grafts compared with fistulas.

作者信息

Trerotola Scott O, Kothari Shawn, Sammarco Therese E, Chittams Jesse L

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):240-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.10.048. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether hemodialysis patients with central venous stenosis (CVS) are more frequently symptomatic if they have grafts versus fistulas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 500 consecutive discrete patients, half with fistulas and half with grafts, who had fistulograms performed over a 4-year period. All fistulograms were evaluated for CVS, which was graded into quartiles. The presence of collaterals was noted and graded. Patient records were analyzed for symptoms of CVS, including face, neck, breast, or limb swelling. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the association between access type, degree of stenosis, location of stenosis, and symptoms.

RESULTS

Of 500 fistulograms, 31 were excluded because of inadequate or absent central imaging. Of the remaining 469 patients, 235 had fistulas and 234 had grafts. CVS was present in 51% of patients with fistulas (119 of 237) and 51% of patients with grafts (118 of 237). When CVS was present, 29% (35 of 119) of patients with fistulas were symptomatic versus 52% (62 of 118) of patients with grafts (P = .0005). Overall, only 15% of patients with fistulas in the entire cohort were symptomatic compared with 27% of patients with grafts (P = .002). Sex, access side, and transposition did not influence symptoms; however, patients with upper arm access were more likely than patients with forearm access to be symptomatic (P < .0001), independent of access type.

CONCLUSIONS

CVS is more likely to be symptomatic in patients with grafts versus fistulas, and patients with upper arm access are more likely than patients with forearm access to be symptomatic.

摘要

目的

确定患有中心静脉狭窄(CVS)的血液透析患者使用移植物与动静脉内瘘相比,出现症状的频率是否更高。

材料与方法

对连续500例不同患者进行回顾性研究,其中一半患者使用动静脉内瘘,另一半使用移植物,这些患者在4年期间进行了内瘘造影。对所有内瘘造影进行CVS评估,并将其分为四分位数。记录并分级侧支血管的存在情况。分析患者记录中CVS的症状,包括面部、颈部、胸部或肢体肿胀。进行统计分析以确定通路类型、狭窄程度、狭窄部位与症状之间的关联。

结果

在500例内瘘造影中,31例因中心成像不足或缺失而被排除。在其余469例患者中,235例使用动静脉内瘘,234例使用移植物。51%的动静脉内瘘患者(237例中的119例)和51%的移植物患者(237例中的118例)存在CVS。当存在CVS时,29%(119例中的35例)的动静脉内瘘患者出现症状,而移植物患者为52%(118例中的62例)(P = 0.0005)。总体而言,整个队列中只有15%的动静脉内瘘患者出现症状,而移植物患者为27%(P = 0.002)。性别、通路侧别和转位不影响症状;然而,上臂通路的患者比前臂通路的患者更易出现症状(P < 0.0001),与通路类型无关。

结论

与动静脉内瘘患者相比,使用移植物的患者CVS更易出现症状,且上臂通路的患者比前臂通路的患者更易出现症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验