Trimboli Pierpaolo, Treglia Giorgio, Sadeghi Ramin, Romanelli Francesco, Giovanella Luca
Section of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Ospedale Israelitico di Roma, Via Fulda, 14, 00148, Rome, Italy.
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Thyroid Centre, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Endocrine. 2015 Nov;50(2):335-43. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0510-9. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
The main limit of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is represented by indeterminate report. Recently, real-time elastography (RTE) has been described in the management of these cases. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of published studies specifically focused on the use of RTE in indeterminate thyroid nodules. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases was conducted by using the combination of the terms "thyroid" and "indeterminate" and "elastography." Pooled sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of RTE as predictor of malignancy in thyroid nodules with indeterminate FNAC were calculated, including 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The area under the summary ROC curve (AUC) was also assessed. Databases found 572 papers, and eight were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, six studies had prospective design and two were retrospective. Pooled malignancy rate was 31%. As common denominator, all studies set the prevalence of hardness within the nodule as risk factor for malignancy of the lesion. Sensitivity of RTE ranged from 11 to 89% (pooled estimate of 69%; 95% CI 55-82%), specificity varied from 6 to 100% (pooled estimate of 75%; 95% CI 42-96%), and accuracy was comprised between 35 and 94% (pooled estimate of 73%; 95% CI 54-89%). The AUC was 0.77. RTE has suboptimal diagnostic accuracy to diagnose thyroid nodules previously classified as indeterminate. Then, RTE alone should not be used for selecting these patients for surgery or not. We advice for further studies using other elastographic approaches and combined RTE and B-mode ultrasonography.
甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)的主要局限性表现为诊断结果不确定。近年来,实时弹性成像(RTE)已被应用于此类病例的处理。在此,我们对已发表的专门针对RTE在甲状腺结节诊断不确定病例中的应用的研究进行了荟萃分析。通过结合“甲状腺”“不确定”和“弹性成像”等关键词,对PubMed/MEDLINE和谷歌学术数据库进行了全面的文献检索。计算了RTE作为FNAC诊断不确定的甲状腺结节恶性肿瘤预测指标的合并敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),包括95%置信区间(95%CI)。还评估了汇总ROC曲线下面积(AUC)。数据库共找到572篇论文,其中8篇纳入荟萃分析。其中,6项研究为前瞻性设计,2项为回顾性研究。合并恶性肿瘤发生率为31%。作为共同标准,所有研究均将结节内硬度的发生率作为病变恶性肿瘤的危险因素。RTE的敏感性范围为11%至89%(合并估计值为69%;95%CI为55%-82%),特异性从6%至100%不等(合并估计值为75%;95%CI为42%-96%),准确性在35%至94%之间(合并估计值为73%;95%CI为54%-89%)。AUC为0.77。RTE对诊断先前分类为不确定的甲状腺结节的诊断准确性欠佳。因此,不应仅使用RTE来决定这些患者是否进行手术。我们建议进一步开展使用其他弹性成像方法以及联合RTE和B型超声检查的研究。