• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳房上提手术在线资源的可读性

The Readability of Online Resources for Mastopexy Surgery.

作者信息

Vargas Christina R, Chuang Danielle J, Lee Bernard T

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;77(1):110-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000340.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000340
PMID:25536208
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As more patients use Internet resources for health information, there is increasing interest in evaluating the readability of available online materials. The National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association recommend that patient educational content be written at a sixth-grade reading level. This study evaluates the most popular online resources for information about mastopexy relative to average adult literacy in the United States.

METHODS

The 12 most popular sites returned by the largest Internet search engine were identified using the search term "breast lift surgery." Relevant articles from the main sites were downloaded and formatted into text documents. Pictures, captions, links, and references were excluded. The readability of these 100 articles was analyzed overall and subsequently by site using 10 established readability tests. Subgroup analysis was performed for articles discussing the benefits of surgery and those focusing on risks.

RESULTS

The overall average readability of online patient information was 13.3 (range, 11.1-15). There was a range of average readability scores overall across the 12 sites from 8.9 to 16.1, suggesting that some may be more appropriate than others for patient demographics with different health literacy levels. Subgroup analysis revealed that articles discussing the risks of mastopexy were significantly harder to read (mean, 14.1) than articles about benefits (11.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-directed articles from the most popular online resources for mastopexy information are uniformly above the recommended reading level and likely too difficult to be understood by a large number of patients in the United States.

摘要

背景

随着越来越多的患者使用互联网资源获取健康信息,人们对评估现有在线材料的可读性越来越感兴趣。美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学协会建议,患者教育内容应以六年级阅读水平编写。本研究评估了美国关于乳房提升术信息的最受欢迎的在线资源相对于平均成人识字水平的情况。

方法

使用搜索词“乳房提升手术”确定最大的互联网搜索引擎返回的12个最受欢迎的网站。从主要网站下载相关文章并格式化为文本文件。排除图片、标题、链接和参考文献。使用10种既定的可读性测试对这100篇文章的可读性进行整体分析,随后按网站进行分析。对讨论手术益处的文章和关注风险的文章进行亚组分析。

结果

在线患者信息的总体平均可读性为13.3(范围为11.1 - 15)。12个网站的总体平均可读性得分范围为8.9至16.1,这表明对于不同健康素养水平的患者群体,有些网站可能比其他网站更合适。亚组分析显示,讨论乳房提升术风险的文章(平均为14.1)比关于益处的文章(11.6)更难阅读。

结论

来自最受欢迎的乳房提升术信息在线资源的面向患者的文章均高于推荐的阅读水平,可能对美国大量患者来说太难理解。

相似文献

1
The Readability of Online Resources for Mastopexy Surgery.乳房上提手术在线资源的可读性
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;77(1):110-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000340.
2
Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.抽脂手术的在线患者资源:可读性比较分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Mar;76(3):349-54. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000438.
3
Readability assessment of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery.隆胸手术在线患者资源的可读性评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1573-1579. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001230.
4
Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer.在线乳腺癌手术治疗患者资源的易读性。
Surgery. 2014 Aug;156(2):311-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
5
Readability Assessment of Online Patient Abdominoplasty Resources.在线腹部整形手术患者资源的可读性评估。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Feb;39(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0425-0. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
6
Readability of online patient resources for melanoma.黑色素瘤在线患者资源的可读性。
Melanoma Res. 2016 Feb;26(1):58-65. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000210.
7
Online patient resources for hernia repair: analysis of readability.疝修补术在线患者资源:可读性分析。
J Surg Res. 2014 Jul;190(1):144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.045. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
8
Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.肺癌相关在线资源的可读性分析
J Surg Res. 2016 Nov;206(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
9
Online patient resources for breast reconstruction: an analysis of readability.乳房重建的在线患者资源:可读性分析
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep;134(3):406-413. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000472.
10
The Readability of Online Patient Information About Mohs Micrographic Surgery.关于莫氏显微外科手术的在线患者信息的可读性
Dermatol Surg. 2016 Oct;42(10):1135-41. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000866.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review.整形外科学中的健康素养:一项范围综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e4247. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004247. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
A Multimetric Readability Analysis of Online Patient Educational Materials for Submental Fat Reduction.一项关于颏下脂肪减少的在线患者教育材料多指标可读性分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):712-718. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02675-9. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
3
Missing the Mark: The State of Health Care Literacy in Plastic Surgery.
未达目标:整形外科学术中的医疗健康素养状况
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 May 13;8(5):e2856. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002856. eCollection 2020 May.