• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疝修补术在线患者资源:可读性分析。

Online patient resources for hernia repair: analysis of readability.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2014 Jul;190(1):144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.045. Epub 2014 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.045
PMID:24746256
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The limited functional health literacy of a significant portion of the adult US population negatively affects their access to appropriate online health information about hernia repair surgery. The National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association recommend that patient-directed content should be written at a sixth-grade reading level. This study aims to evaluate readability of the most frequently used Internet resources for patient information about hernia repair relative to average American literacy.

METHODS

A web search for "hernia repair surgery" was performed, and the top 12 Web sites were identified. Relevant articles (n=102) with patient-directed content immediately available from the main sites were downloaded. The 12 most popular consumer magazines in circulation were also identified, and using the same method, the first 10 articles were downloaded from each magazine's Web site for comparison. Readability was assessed using 10 established analyses. A t-test was used to compare the average grade level of hernia repair and magazine articles for each readability test.

RESULTS

Web-based information about hernia repair had an overall average reading grade level of 13.6. All 102 articles were above the recommended sixth-grade reading level; these were significantly more difficult to read than the comparison group of articles from popular magazines.

CONCLUSIONS

Online patient-directed information about hernia repair uniformly exceeds the recommended reading level and may be too difficult to be understood by a large portion of the US population.

摘要

背景

相当一部分美国成年人的功能性健康素养有限,这会影响他们获取有关疝修补手术的适当在线健康信息。美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学协会建议,面向患者的内容应编写为六年级阅读水平。本研究旨在评估疝修补最常用的互联网资源的可读性,相对于美国普通读写能力。

方法

对“疝修补手术”进行了网络搜索,确定了前 12 个网站。从主要网站上立即获取面向患者的内容的相关文章(n=102)。还确定了 12 种发行量最大的消费者杂志,并使用相同的方法,从每种杂志的网站上下载了前 10 篇文章进行比较。使用 10 种已建立的分析方法评估可读性。使用 t 检验比较疝修复和杂志文章的每个可读性测试的平均年级水平。

结果

疝修复的基于网络的信息的总体平均阅读水平为 13.6。所有 102 篇文章均高于推荐的六年级阅读水平;这些文章比来自流行杂志的比较组文章更难阅读。

结论

疝修补的在线面向患者的信息普遍超过了推荐的阅读水平,可能对美国大部分人口来说太难理解。

相似文献

1
Online patient resources for hernia repair: analysis of readability.疝修补术在线患者资源:可读性分析。
J Surg Res. 2014 Jul;190(1):144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.045. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
2
Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer.在线乳腺癌手术治疗患者资源的易读性。
Surgery. 2014 Aug;156(2):311-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
3
The Readability of Online Resources for Mastopexy Surgery.乳房上提手术在线资源的可读性
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;77(1):110-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000340.
4
Patient education for carpal tunnel syndrome: analysis of readability.腕管综合征的患者教育:可读性分析
Hand (N Y). 2015 Sep;10(3):374-80. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9718-7.
5
Readability Assessment of Online Patient Abdominoplasty Resources.在线腹部整形手术患者资源的可读性评估。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Feb;39(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0425-0. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
6
Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.抽脂手术的在线患者资源:可读性比较分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Mar;76(3):349-54. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000438.
7
Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.肺癌相关在线资源的可读性分析
J Surg Res. 2016 Nov;206(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
8
Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.基于互联网的消费者健康信息的可读性评估。
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1310-5.
9
Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.美国运动医学学会网站上患者教育材料的可读性。
Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Nov;42(4):125-30. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.11.2099.
10
Readability of online patient resources for melanoma.黑色素瘤在线患者资源的可读性。
Melanoma Res. 2016 Feb;26(1):58-65. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000210.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of natural language processors for patients seeking inguinal hernia information.自然语言处理器对寻求腹股沟疝信息患者的准确性。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7409-7415. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11221-y. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Online resources for strabismus: an evaluation of readability, complexity, and suitability.斜视的在线资源:可读性、复杂性和适用性评估
Strabismus. 2025 Mar;33(1):36-43. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2024.2408029. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
Spanish-language bariatric surgery patient education materials fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability.
西班牙语肥胖症手术患者教育材料未能达到卫生保健读写能力标准。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6417-6428. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10088-9. Epub 2023 May 2.
4
The Impact of Popular Science Articles by Physicians on Their Performance on Online Medical Platforms.医生撰写的科普文章对其在在线医疗平台上表现的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;10(12):2432. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122432.
5
Online Resources for Patients Considering Hiatal Hernia Repair: a Quality and Readability Analysis.考虑食管裂孔疝修补术患者的在线资源:质量与可读性分析
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Mar;27(3):598-600. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05460-4. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
6
Accuracy of Online Pictorial Resources for Common Hand Surgery Procedures.常见手部手术操作的在线图示资源的准确性。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Mar;17(2):361-365. doi: 10.1177/1558944720937360. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
7
The readability of online health resources for phenylketonuria.苯丙酮尿症在线健康资源的可读性。
J Community Genet. 2020 Oct;11(4):451-459. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00461-9. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
8
Poor Readability of Online Patient Resources Regarding Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma.关于黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检的在线患者资源可读性较差。
Cureus. 2019 Jan 13;11(1):e3877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3877.
9
Readability of Online Materials for Rhinoplasty.隆鼻在线材料的可读性
World J Plast Surg. 2018 Jan;7(1):89-96.
10
Patient education for carpal tunnel syndrome: analysis of readability.腕管综合征的患者教育:可读性分析
Hand (N Y). 2015 Sep;10(3):374-80. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9718-7.