Snodderly D Max
Department of Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin, United States.
Vision Res. 2016 Jan;118:31-47. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
For a behavioral neuroscientist, fixational eye movements are a double-edged sword. On one edge, they make control of visual stimuli difficult, but on the other edge they provide insight into the ways the visual system acquires information from the environment. We have studied macaque monkeys as models for human visual systems. Fixational eye movements of monkeys are similar to those of humans but they are more often vertically biased and spatially more dispersed. Eye movements scatter stimuli from their intended retinal locations, increase variability of neuronal responses, inflate estimates of receptive field size, and decrease measures of response amplitude. They also bias against successful stimulation of extremely selective cells. Compensating for eye movements reduced these errors and revealed a fine-grained motion pathway from V1 feeding the cortical ventral stream. Compensation is a useful tool for the experimenter, but rather than compensating for eye movements, the brain utilizes them as part of its input. The saccades and drifts that occur during fixation selectively activate different types of V1 neurons. Cells that prefer slower speeds respond during the drift periods with maintained discharges and tend to have smaller receptive fields that are selective for sign of contrast. They are well suited to code small details of the image and to enable our fine detailed vision. Cells that prefer higher speeds fire transient bursts of spikes when the receptive field leaves, crosses, or lands on a stimulus, but only the most transient ones (about one-third of our sample) failed to respond during drifts. Voluntary and fixational saccades had very similar effects, including the presence of a biphasic extraretinal modulation that interacted with stimulus-driven responses. Saccades evoke synchronous bursts that can enhance visibility but these bursts may also participate in the visual masking that contributes to saccadic suppression. Study of the small eye movements of fixation may illuminate some of the big problems in vision.
对于行为神经科学家而言,注视性眼球运动是一把双刃剑。一方面,它们使视觉刺激的控制变得困难,但另一方面,它们能让我们深入了解视觉系统从环境中获取信息的方式。我们以猕猴作为人类视觉系统的模型进行了研究。猕猴的注视性眼球运动与人类相似,但更常出现垂直偏向且在空间上分布更分散。眼球运动会使刺激偏离其预期的视网膜位置,增加神经元反应的变异性,夸大感受野大小的估计,并降低反应幅度的测量值。它们还不利于对极具选择性的细胞进行成功刺激。补偿眼球运动可减少这些误差,并揭示了一条从初级视觉皮层(V1)通向皮层腹侧流的精细运动通路。补偿对实验者来说是一种有用的工具,但大脑并非对眼球运动进行补偿,而是将其作为输入的一部分加以利用。注视过程中发生的扫视和漂移会选择性地激活不同类型的V1神经元。偏好较慢速度的细胞在漂移期以持续放电的方式做出反应,并且往往具有较小的感受野,这些感受野对对比度的正负具有选择性。它们非常适合编码图像的小细节并实现我们精细的细节视觉。当感受野离开、穿过或落在刺激上时,偏好较高速度的细胞会触发短暂的尖峰爆发,但只有最短暂的那些细胞(约占我们样本的三分之一)在漂移期间没有反应。随意性和注视性扫视具有非常相似的效果,包括存在一种与刺激驱动反应相互作用的双相视网膜外调制。扫视会引发同步爆发,这可以增强可见性,但这些爆发也可能参与导致扫视抑制的视觉掩蔽。对注视时微小眼球运动的研究可能会阐明视觉方面的一些重大问题。