• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体位对血液动力学的影响:比较围手术期丙泊酚和七氟醚麻醉。

Hemodynamic effects of chest-knee position: comparison of perioperative propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia.

出版信息

Turk J Med Sci. 2014;44(2):317-22. doi: 10.3906/sag-1303-23.

DOI:10.3906/sag-1303-23
PMID:25536743
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: There are limited data in the literature investigating the effects of anesthetic agents on cardiac output used in the chest-knee position. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of inhalation and total intravenous anesthesia on cardiac output in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy in the chest-knee position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients undergoing discectomy in the chest-knee position were allocated to 2 groups. The first group (GrS, n = 20) received sevoflurane after thiopental induction, while the second group (GrP, n = 20) received propofol induction and infusion. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral oxygen saturation, cardiac output (CO), and cardiac index (CI) were recorded.

RESULTS

Groups were comparable in terms of HR and MAP. The differences related to anesthetic technique and position were statistically significant within each group. Cardiac output and CI were similar between the groups. Cardiac output and CI of GrP were found to be decreased in the chest-knee position and significantly elevated in the supine position after surgery (P < 0.05). There were significant decreases in the mean CO and CI values recorded after the chest-knee position in GrP.

CONCLUSION

Sevoflurane is found to be superior when compared to propofol in patients undergoing surgery in the chest-knee position in terms of perioperative hemodynamic stability. Therefore, sevoflurane may be the anesthetic of choice, especially in patients operated on in the chest-knee position with suspected hemodynamic instability.

摘要

背景/目的:在胸部-膝盖位置下,用于研究麻醉剂对心输出量影响的文献数据有限。本研究旨在比较吸入麻醉和全静脉麻醉对胸部-膝盖位置下行腰椎间盘切除术患者心输出量的影响。

材料和方法

40 例在胸部-膝盖位置行椎间盘切除术的患者被分配到 2 组。第一组(GrS,n = 20)在硫喷妥钠诱导后接受七氟醚,而第二组(GrP,n = 20)接受丙泊酚诱导和输注。记录心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、外周血氧饱和度、心输出量(CO)和心指数(CI)。

结果

两组的 HR 和 MAP 相当。与麻醉技术和体位相关的差异在每组内均具有统计学意义。两组之间 CO 和 CI 无差异。GrP 在胸部-膝盖位置时 CO 和 CI 降低,手术后仰卧位时显著升高(P < 0.05)。GrP 在胸部-膝盖位置后 CO 和 CI 的平均值显著降低。

结论

在胸部-膝盖位置下手术的患者中,与丙泊酚相比,七氟醚在围手术期血流动力学稳定性方面表现更优。因此,七氟醚可能是首选麻醉剂,尤其是在怀疑血流动力学不稳定的患者中在胸部-膝盖位置下进行手术。

相似文献

1
Hemodynamic effects of chest-knee position: comparison of perioperative propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia.体位对血液动力学的影响:比较围手术期丙泊酚和七氟醚麻醉。
Turk J Med Sci. 2014;44(2):317-22. doi: 10.3906/sag-1303-23.
2
Anesthesia management for the super obese: is sevoflurane superior to propofol as a sole anesthetic agent? A double-blind randomized controlled trial.超级肥胖患者的麻醉管理:七氟醚作为单一麻醉剂是否优于丙泊酚?一项双盲随机对照试验。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Jul;19(13):2493-500.
3
Propofol TCI Reductions Do Not Attenuate Significant Falls in Cardiac Output Associated With Anesthesia Induction and Knee-Chest Positioning in Spinal Surgery.异丙酚 TCI 降低并不能减轻脊柱手术全身麻醉诱导和膝胸位时心输出量的显著下降。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Apr;32(2):147-155. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000572.
4
Using the nociception level index to compare the intraoperative antinociceptive effect of propofol and sevoflurane during clinical and experimental noxious stimulus in patients under general anesthesia.使用伤害感受水平指数比较丙泊酚和七氟醚在临床和实验性有害刺激下全麻患者术中的抗伤害作用。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Sep;96:111484. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111484. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Maintenance and recovery characteristics after sevoflurane or propofol during ambulatory surgery in children with epidural blockade.小儿硬膜外阻滞非住院手术期间七氟醚或丙泊酚麻醉后的维持及恢复特征
Can J Anaesth. 1998 Nov;45(11):1072-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03012394.
6
Comparison of a loading dose of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol or sevoflurane for hemodynamic changes during anesthesia maintenance: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.麻醉维持期间负荷剂量右美托咪定联合丙泊酚或七氟醚对血流动力学变化影响的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照临床试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Jan 24;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0468-x.
7
[Comparison of rapid anesthetic induction with sevoflurane vs target-controlled infusion of propofol].七氟醚快速麻醉诱导与丙泊酚靶控输注的比较
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2008 Oct;55(8):461-7. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(08)70628-5.
8
Sevoflurane versus propofol anesthesia in patients undergoing lumbar spondylodesis: a randomized trial.七氟醚与丙泊酚麻醉在腰椎融合术患者中的应用:一项随机试验。
J Surg Res. 2013 Jan;179(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.09.038. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
9
The effects of intravenous anesthetics on QT interval during anesthetic induction with sevoflurane.七氟醚麻醉诱导期间静脉麻醉药对QT间期的影响。
J Anesth. 2016 Dec;30(6):929-934. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2252-8. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
10
Sevoflurane vs. TIVA in terms of middle ear pressure during laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中七氟醚与全凭静脉麻醉对中耳压力的影响比较
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2014 May-Jun;23(3):447-54. doi: 10.17219/acem/37144.