Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Hospital Melbourne School of Population and Global Health.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne Department of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute.
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 15;60(8):1228-36. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu1162. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
Our aim was to determine the efficacy of 1 g azithromycin and alternative antibiotic regimens in a prospective cohort of Mycoplasma genitalium-infected participants, and factors associated with azithromycin failure.
Consecutive eligible M. genitalium-infected men and women attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between July 2012 and June 2013 were treated with 1 g of azithromycin and retested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on days 14 and 28. Cure was defined as PCR negative on day 28. Cases failing azithromycin were treated with moxifloxacin, and those failing moxifloxacin were treated with pristinamycin. Pre- and posttreatment samples were assessed for macrolide resistance mutations (MRMs) by high-resolution melt analysis. Mycoplasma genitalium samples from cases failing moxifloxacin were sequenced for fluoroquinolone resistance mutations. Multivariable analysis was used to examine associations with azithromycin failure.
Of 155 participants treated with 1 g azithromycin, 95 (61% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 53%-69%]) were cured. Pretreatment MRM was detected in 56 (36% [95% CI, 28%-43%]) participants, and strongly associated with treatment failure (87% [95% CI, 76%-94%]; adjusted odds ratio, 47.0 [95% CI, 17.1-129.0]). All 11 participants who had MRM detected in posttreatment samples failed azithromycin. Moxifloxacin was effective in 53(88% [95% CI, 78%-94%]) of 60 cases failing azithromycin; all failures had gyrA and parC mutations detected in pretreatment samples. Six of 7 patients failing moxifloxacin treatment received pristinamycin, and all were PCR negative 28 days after pristinamycin treatment.
We report a high azithromycin failure rate (39%) in an M. genitalium-infected cohort in association with high levels of pretreatment macrolide resistance. Moxifloxacin failure occurred in 12% of patients who received moxifloxacin; all had pretreatment fluoroquinolone mutations detected. Pristinamycin was highly effective in treating macrolide- and quinolone-resistant strains.
我们的目的是在一组前瞻性的解脲支原体感染参与者中确定 1 克阿奇霉素和替代抗生素方案的疗效,以及与阿奇霉素失败相关的因素。
2012 年 7 月至 2013 年 6 月期间,连续符合条件的解脲支原体感染的男性和女性在墨尔本性健康中心接受 1 克阿奇霉素治疗,并通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)在第 14 天和第 28 天进行重新检测。治愈定义为第 28 天 PCR 阴性。阿奇霉素治疗失败的病例用莫西沙星治疗,莫西沙星治疗失败的病例用普林霉素治疗。通过高分辨率熔解分析评估治疗前后样本中大环内酯类药物耐药突变(MRMs)。对莫西沙星治疗失败的解脲支原体样本进行氟喹诺酮类耐药突变的测序。多变量分析用于检查与阿奇霉素失败相关的因素。
在接受 1 克阿奇霉素治疗的 155 名参与者中,95 名(61%[95%置信区间{CI},53%-69%])治愈。56 名(36%[95%CI,28%-43%])参与者在治疗前检测到 MRM,与治疗失败密切相关(87%[95%CI,76%-94%];调整后的优势比,47.0[95%CI,17.1-129.0])。所有在治疗后样本中检测到 MRM 的 11 名参与者均未通过阿奇霉素治疗。在 60 例阿奇霉素治疗失败的病例中,莫西沙星有效治疗了 53 例(88%[95%CI,78%-94%]);所有失败病例均在治疗前样本中检测到 gyrA 和 parC 突变。莫西沙星治疗失败的 7 例患者中有 6 例接受了普林霉素治疗,所有患者在接受普林霉素治疗 28 天后 PCR 均为阴性。
我们报告了在解脲支原体感染队列中阿奇霉素高失败率(39%)与高水平治疗前大环内酯类耐药相关。接受莫西沙星治疗的患者中有 12%出现莫西沙星治疗失败;所有患者均在治疗前检测到氟喹诺酮类药物突变。普林霉素对治疗大环内酯类和氟喹诺酮类耐药株非常有效。