Jiao Yanpeng, Sun Ivan Y, Farmer Ashley K, Lin Kai
Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
J Interpers Violence. 2016 Apr;31(7):1208-29. doi: 10.1177/0886260514564162. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
Although a large number of studies have been conducted worldwide to examine various aspects of intimate partner violence (IPV), comparative study of people's views on such violence in Chinese societies has been scarce. Using survey data collected from more than 850 college students in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, this study specifically assessed the impact of attitudes toward gender role and violence, personal and vicarious experience, demographic characteristics, and locality on students' definitions of IPV. The Taiwanese students were most likely to define a broader range of abusive behavior as IPV, followed by Hong Kong and Beijing students. Gender role and violence attitudes appeared to be most important predictors of IPV definitions. College students who supported the notion of male dominance were more likely to have a narrower definition of IPV, whereas those who viewed domestic violence as crime were more inclined to have a broader definition of IPV. Implications for future research and policy were discussed.
尽管全球范围内已经开展了大量研究来考察亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）的各个方面，但针对中国社会中人们对这种暴力看法的比较研究却很匮乏。本研究利用从中国内地、香港和台湾地区850多名大学生收集的调查数据，具体评估了性别角色与暴力态度、个人及间接经历、人口统计学特征以及地区对学生对亲密伴侣暴力定义的影响。台湾地区的学生最有可能将更广泛的虐待行为定义为亲密伴侣暴力，其次是香港地区和北京的学生。性别角色和暴力态度似乎是亲密伴侣暴力定义的最重要预测因素。支持男性主导观念的大学生更有可能对亲密伴侣暴力有更狭义的定义，而那些将家庭暴力视为犯罪的学生则更倾向于对亲密伴侣暴力有更广义的定义。文中还讨论了对未来研究和政策的启示。
