Sodhi Kanwalpreet, Singla Manender Kumar, Shrivastava Anupam, Bansal Namita
Department of Critical Care, SPS Apollo Hospitals, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care and Statistician, SPS Apollo Hospitals, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec;18(12):789-95. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.146312.
Ageing being a global phenomenon, increasing number of elderly patients are admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICU). Hence, there is a need for continued research on outcomes of ICU treatment in the elderly.
Examine age-related difference in outcomes of geriatric ICU patients. Analyze ICU treatment modalities predicting mortality in patients >65 years of age.
A retrospective observational study was conducted in 2317 patients admitted in a multi-specialty ICU of a tertiary care hospital over 2-year study period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012. A clinical database was collected which included age, sex, specialty under which admitted, APACHE-II and SOFA scores, patient outcome, average length of ICU stay, and the treatment modalities used in ICU including mechanical ventilation, inotropes, hemodialysis, and tracheostomy. Patients were divided into two groups: <65 years (Control group) and >65 years (Geriatric age group).
The observed overall ICU mortality rate in the study population was 19.6%; no statistical difference was observed between the control and geriatric age group in overall mortality (P > 0.05). Mechanical ventilation (P = 0.003, odds ratio [OR] =0.573, 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.390-0.843) and use of inotropes (P = 0.018, OR = 0.661, 95% CI = 0.456-0.958) were found to be predictors of mortality in elderly population. On multivariate analysis, inotropic support was found to be an independent ICU treatment modality predicting mortality in the geriatric age group (β coefficient = 1.221, P = 0.000).
Intensive Care Unit mortality rates increased in the geriatric population requiring mechanical ventilation and inotropes during ICU stay. Only inotropic support could be identified as independent risk factor for mortality.
老龄化是一种全球现象,越来越多的老年患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)。因此,有必要持续开展关于老年患者ICU治疗结局的研究。
研究老年ICU患者结局的年龄相关差异。分析预测65岁以上患者死亡率的ICU治疗方式。
在2011年1月1日至2012年12月31日的2年研究期间,对一家三级医院多专科ICU收治的2317例患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。收集了一个临床数据库,其中包括年龄、性别、收治科室、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统-II(APACHE-II)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、患者结局、ICU平均住院时间以及ICU使用的治疗方式,包括机械通气、血管活性药物、血液透析和气管切开术。患者分为两组:<65岁(对照组)和>65岁(老年年龄组)。
研究人群中观察到的总体ICU死亡率为19.6%;对照组和老年年龄组在总体死亡率方面未观察到统计学差异(P>0.05)。机械通气(P=0.003,比值比[OR]=0.573,95%置信区间[CI]=0.390 - 0.843)和血管活性药物的使用(P=0.018,OR = 0.661,95% CI = 0.456 - 0.958)被发现是老年人群死亡率的预测因素。多因素分析显示,血管活性药物支持是预测老年年龄组死亡率的独立ICU治疗方式(β系数 = 1.221,P = 0.000)。
在ICU住院期间需要机械通气和血管活性药物的老年人群中,重症监护病房死亡率增加。只有血管活性药物支持可被确定为死亡率的独立危险因素。