Hashimoto Daniel A, Sirimanna Pramudith, Gomez Ernest D, Beyer-Berjot Laura, Ericsson K A, Williams Noel N, Darzi Ara, Aggarwal Rajesh
Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3154-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4042-4. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
This study investigated whether deliberate practice leads to an increase in surgical quality in virtual reality (VR) laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC). Previous research has suggested that sustained DP is effective in surgical training.
Fourteen residents were randomized into deliberate practice (n = 7) or control training (n = 7). Both groups performed ten sessions of two VR LCs. Each session, the DP group was assigned 30 min of DP activities in between LCs while the control group viewed educational videos or read journal articles. Performance was assessed on speed and dexterity; quality was rated with global (GRS) and procedure-specific (PSRS) rating scales. All participants then performed five porcine LCs.
Both groups improved over 20 VR LCs in time, dexterity, and global rating scales (all p < 0.05). After 20 LCs, there were no differences in speed or dexterity between groups. The DP group achieved higher quality of VR surgical performance than control for GRS (26 vs. 20, p = 0.001) and PSRS (18 vs. 15, p = 0.001). For VR cases, DP subjects plateaued at GRS = 25 after ten cases and control group at GRS = 20 after five cases. At completion of VR training, 100 % of the DP group reached target quality of performance (GRS ≥ 21) compared with 30 % in the control group. There were no significant differences for improvements in time or dexterity over five porcine LCs.
This study suggests that DP leads to higher quality performance in VR LC than standard training alone. Standard training may leave individuals in a state of "arrested development" compared with DP.
本研究调查了刻意练习是否会提高虚拟现实(VR)腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的手术质量。先前的研究表明,持续的刻意练习在手术训练中是有效的。
14名住院医师被随机分为刻意练习组(n = 7)或对照组(n = 7)。两组均进行10次VR LC操作。每次操作时,刻意练习组在两次VR LC操作之间被安排30分钟的刻意练习活动,而对照组观看教育视频或阅读期刊文章。对操作速度和灵巧性进行评估;质量通过整体(GRS)和特定手术(PSRS)评分量表进行评级。然后所有参与者进行5次猪腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
两组在20次VR LC操作后,在时间、灵巧性和整体评分量表上均有改善(所有p < 0.05)。在进行20次LC操作后,两组在速度或灵巧性方面没有差异。刻意练习组在GRS(26对20,p = 0.001)和PSRS(18对15,p = 0.001)方面的VR手术表现质量高于对照组。对于VR病例,刻意练习组在10例病例后GRS达到25的平稳状态,对照组在5例病例后GRS达到20的平稳状态。在VR训练结束时,刻意练习组100%达到了目标操作质量(GRS≥21),而对照组为30%。在5次猪腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,时间或灵巧性的改善没有显著差异。
本研究表明刻意练习在VR LC中比单独的标准训练能带来更高质量的表现。与刻意练习相比,标准训练可能会使个体处于“发育停滞”状态。