Treinen Charles, Lomelin Daniel, Krause Crystal, Goede Matthew, Oleynikov Dmitry
Center for Advanced Surgical Technology, Department of General Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986245 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-6245, USA,
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 May;400(4):421-7. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1267-6. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) is characterized by severe gallbladder inflammation without cystic duct obstruction. Critical illness and neurological deficits are often associated with AAC, and early radiologic imaging is necessary for the detection and timely treatment of AAC. In critically ill patients, effective surgical management is difficult. This review examines the three common surgical treatments for AAC (open cholecystectomy (OC), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), or percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC)), their prevalence in current literature, and the perioperative outcomes of these different approaches using a large retrospective database.
This review examined literature gathered from PubMed and Google Scholar to select more than 50 sources with data pertinent to AAC; of which 20 are described in a summary table. Outcomes from our previous research and several updated results were obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) database.
LC has proven effective in treating AAC when the risks of general anesthesia and the chance for conversion to OC are low. In critically ill patients with multiple comorbidities, PC or OC may be the only available options. Data in the literature and an examination of outcomes within a national database indicate that for severely ill patients, PC may be safer and met with better outcomes than OC for the healthier set of AAC patients.
We suggest a three-pronged approach to surgical resolution of AAC. Patients that are healthy enough to tolerate LC should undergo LC early in the course of the disease. In critically ill patients, patients with multiple comorbidities, a high conversion risk, or who are poor surgical candidates, PC may be the safest and most successful intervention.
急性非结石性胆囊炎(AAC)的特征是胆囊严重发炎但无胆囊管梗阻。危重病和神经功能缺损常与AAC相关,早期影像学检查对于AAC的检测和及时治疗至关重要。在危重病患者中,有效的手术管理很困难。本综述探讨了AAC的三种常见手术治疗方法(开腹胆囊切除术(OC)、腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)或经皮胆囊造瘘术(PC))、它们在当前文献中的流行情况,以及使用大型回顾性数据库对这些不同方法的围手术期结果进行分析。
本综述检索了从PubMed和谷歌学术收集的文献,以选择50多个与AAC相关的数据来源;其中20个在汇总表中进行了描述。我们之前研究的结果以及一些更新的结果来自大学卫生系统联盟(UHC)数据库。
当全身麻醉风险和转为OC的可能性较低时,LC已被证明对治疗AAC有效。在患有多种合并症的危重病患者中,PC或OC可能是唯一可行的选择。文献数据和对国家数据库中结果的分析表明,对于病情严重的患者,PC可能比OC更安全,对于病情较轻的AAC患者,PC的治疗效果更好。
我们建议采用三管齐下的方法来手术解决AAC。身体状况足以耐受LC的患者应在疾病早期接受LC。在危重病患者、患有多种合并症、转换风险高或手术候选性差的患者中,PC可能是最安全、最成功的干预措施。