Zhang Yi, Agnoletti Davide, Wang Ji-Guang, Xu Yawei, Safar Michel E
Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Diagnosis and Therapeutic Center, Hotel-Dieu, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Diagnosis and Therapeutic Center, Hotel-Dieu, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015 Jan;9(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
The antihypertensive effect of indapamide has never been clearly understood, particularly in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus. A total of 565 patients were randomly selected to receive either indapamide 1.5 mg or enalapril 10 mg daily for 12 months. Brachial blood pressure (BP) and plasma and urinary electrolytes were measured at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Sodium and potassium levels and excretion rates were measured in overnight urine collections. After 12 months' treatment, similar significant reductions were observed in systolic and diastolic BP and pulse pressure levels in both treatment arms (P < .001). However, age, body mass index, diabetes duration, and plasma sodium reductions were shown to be major, independent factors influencing BP reduction with indapamide, but not with enalapril. Regression coefficients were positive for age and plasma sodium reductions (P ≤ .009) but negative for body mass index and diabetes duration (P ≤ .008). Similar findings were observed for pulse pressure. These results were more notable in elderly patients, did not differ regardless of whether BP reduction was measured in absolute or percent values, and were associated with increased sodium and potassium excretion rates.Indapamide is more effective than enalapril at reducing BP in elderly diabetic hypertensives with marked sodium retention.
吲达帕胺的降压作用从未被完全理解,尤其是在糖尿病高血压患者中。总共随机选取了565例患者,分别每日服用1.5毫克吲达帕胺或10毫克依那普利,疗程为12个月。在基线期和随访结束时测量肱动脉血压(BP)以及血浆和尿液电解质。通过收集过夜尿液来测量钠和钾的水平及排泄率。经过12个月的治疗,两个治疗组的收缩压、舒张压和脉压水平均出现了相似的显著降低(P <.001)。然而,年龄、体重指数、糖尿病病程和血浆钠降低被证明是影响吲达帕胺降压效果的主要独立因素,而对依那普利则不然。年龄和血浆钠降低的回归系数为正(P≤.009),而体重指数和糖尿病病程的回归系数为负(P≤.008)。脉压也有类似发现。这些结果在老年患者中更为显著,无论血压降低是以绝对值还是百分比来衡量均无差异,并且与钠和钾排泄率增加有关。在伴有明显钠潴留的老年糖尿病高血压患者中,吲达帕胺在降低血压方面比依那普利更有效。