重新定义高血压治疗中的利尿剂使用:为何选择噻嗪样利尿剂?

Redefining diuretics use in hypertension: why select a thiazide-like diuretic?

机构信息

Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Lausanne.

Hypertension Research Foundation, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2019 Aug;37(8):1574-1586. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002088.

Abstract

: Diuretics are listed in hypertension guidelines as one of three equally weighted first-line treatment options. In order to differentiate between antihypertensives, a lot of discussion has been directed at side effect profiles and as a result, has created a perhaps disproportionate fear of the metabolic effects that can be associated with diuretics. Data, however, show that the risk of a clinically meaningful change in laboratory parameters is very low, whereas the benefits of volume control and natriuresis are high and the reductions in morbidity and mortality are clinically significant. Moreover, as clinically significant differences in safety and efficacy profiles exist among diuretics, several international guidelines have started making a distinction between thiazides (hydrochlorothiazide) and thiazide-like (chlorthalidone, indapamide) diuretics; and some of them now recommend longer acting thiazide-like diuretics. In time, pending more data, chlorthalidone and indapamide may need to be subdivided further into separate classifications.

摘要

利尿剂被列为高血压指南中三种同等重要的一线治疗选择之一。为了区分降压药物,人们对副作用特征进行了大量讨论,结果可能对利尿剂相关的代谢影响产生了不成比例的担忧。然而,数据表明,实验室参数发生临床意义上显著变化的风险非常低,而容量控制和排钠的益处很高,发病率和死亡率的降低具有临床意义。此外,由于利尿剂在安全性和疗效特征方面存在显著差异,几项国际指南已经开始区分噻嗪类(氢氯噻嗪)和噻嗪样(氯噻酮、吲达帕胺)利尿剂;其中一些指南现在推荐使用作用时间更长的噻嗪样利尿剂。随着更多数据的出现,氯噻酮和吲达帕胺可能需要进一步细分为单独的分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4eb/6615933/f6a5430e633c/jhype-37-1574-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索