Tamaki N, Yamada T, Matsumori A, Fujita T, Ohtani H, Watanabe Y, Yonekura Y, Endo K, Konishi J, Kawai C
Kaku Igaku. 1989 Sep;26(9):1199-205.
Clinical value of 111In-antimyosin monoclonal antibody F ab (AM) was compared with 99mTc-pyrophosphate (PYP) in 13 patients with myocardial infarction and 3 patients with myocarditis. Following PYP injection, PYP imaging was performed 3 hours later. Immediately after PYP imaging, AM was administrated and AM images were obtained 48 hours later. Abnormal accumulation in the infarcted myocardium was observed in 11 patients (85%) on AM images but only in 3 patients (23%) on PYP images. All patients within 8 days after the onset of infarction showed abnormal uptake on both images. Of 5 patients with 1 to 2 weeks after the onset of infarction, abnormal uptake was observed in all of them on AM images but only in one of them on PYP imaging. Furthermore, of 6 patients with more than 2 weeks after the onset, AM imaging showed abnormal uptake in 4 (67%) but PYP imaging did not show abnormal uptake in any of them. Similarly. Of 3 patients with myocarditis, diffuse uptake in the myocardium ws observed in 2 of them on AM images but none of them showed abnormal uptake on PYP images. We conclude that AM imaging is a useful means for identifying not only acute stages but also subacute stages of myocardial necrosis where PYP imaging did not show any abnormality.
在13例心肌梗死患者和3例心肌炎患者中,对铟-111抗肌凝蛋白单克隆抗体F ab片段(AM)与锝-99m焦磷酸盐(PYP)的临床价值进行了比较。注射PYP后3小时进行PYP显像。PYP显像后立即给予AM,并于48小时后获得AM图像。AM图像上有11例患者(85%)梗死心肌出现异常聚集,而PYP图像上仅有3例患者(23%)出现异常聚集。梗死发作后8天内的所有患者在两种图像上均显示异常摄取。梗死发作后1至2周的5例患者中,AM图像上均观察到异常摄取,而PYP显像中只有1例出现异常摄取。此外,在发病超过2周的6例患者中,AM显像有4例(67%)显示异常摄取,而PYP显像在所有患者中均未显示异常摄取。同样,在3例心肌炎患者中,AM图像上有2例观察到心肌弥漫性摄取,而PYP图像上均未显示异常摄取。我们得出结论,AM显像不仅是识别心肌坏死急性期的有用方法,也是识别PYP显像未显示任何异常的心肌坏死亚急性期的有用方法。