Bisi G, Sciagrà R, Santoro G M, Brocchi A, Paladini S, Fazzini P F
Dipartimento di Fisiopathologia Clinica, Università di Firenze.
G Ital Cardiol. 1988 Apr;18(4):281-9.
Labelled monoclonal antimyosin antibodies have been proposed for the diagnostic imaging of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In order to verify in the clinical practice the theoretical advantages of this new approach, we performed planar imaging with a commercial kit of 111In-antimyosin (111In-AM) in 17 patients admitted to our Coronary Care Unit with the diagnosis of AMI. The results were compared with the echocardiographic assessment of AMI and, in 9 subjects, also with 99mTc-pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) scintigraphy. Furthermore, the in-vivo kinetics of 111In-AM was investigated in 11 patients (blood pool activity curve; column gel-chromatography of the injected compound and patient serum). 111In-AM images showed a myocardial uptake in 16/17; 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy in 7/9. The site of AMI was correctly identified by 111In-AM in 14/17, was mistaken in one and impossible to evaluate in another (diffuse uptake pattern). AMI extent, qualitatively assessed in 111In-AM images was consonant with echocardiography in 8/17 and with 99mTc-PYP in 5 of 9 subjects studied also with this method. An apparent underestimation, in comparison with echocardiography was found in 2 cases, whilst an overestimation was seen in 5 cases. One patient was also underestimated in comparison with 99mTc-PYP. 111In-AM images showed a poor quality, with considerable liver, bone marrow, kidney and blood pool activity and therefore low target to background ratio. In-vivo kinetics was characterized by a slow clearance from the blood pool.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
标记的单克隆抗肌球蛋白抗体已被用于急性心肌梗死(AMI)的诊断成像。为了在临床实践中验证这种新方法的理论优势,我们使用一种商用的铟 - 111抗肌球蛋白(111In - AM)试剂盒,对17名入住我们冠心病监护病房且诊断为AMI的患者进行了平面成像。将结果与AMI的超声心动图评估结果进行比较,并且在9名受试者中还与99m锝 - 焦磷酸盐(99mTc - PYP)闪烁显像结果进行了比较。此外,还对11名患者的111In - AM体内动力学进行了研究(血池活性曲线;注射化合物和患者血清的柱凝胶色谱法)。111In - AM图像显示16/17例有心肌摄取;99mTc - PYP闪烁显像显示7/9例有摄取。111In - AM在14/17例中正确识别出AMI部位,1例误诊,1例(弥漫性摄取模式)无法评估。在111In - AM图像中定性评估的AMI范围,与超声心动图相比,8/17例一致,与99mTc - PYP相比,在同时用该方法研究的9名受试者中有5例一致。与超声心动图相比,2例明显低估,5例高估。与99mTc - PYP相比,1例患者也被低估。111In - AM图像质量较差,肝脏、骨髓、肾脏和血池活性较高,因此靶本底比值较低。体内动力学的特征是从血池清除缓慢。(摘要截断于250字)