Uesugi Masayuki, Araki Tomoko, Fujii Shun, Itotani Keisuke, Otani Yoshitaka, Seiichi Takemasa
Kobe International University, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Dec;26(12):1907-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1907. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
[Purpose] In this study, we examined problematic behaviors of independent-walking and non-independent-walking handicapped children in the infant, school child and adolescent development phases, using the Japanese version of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC-J) to determine if such behaviors relate to their gross motor abilities. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 86 handicapped children who were receiving physical therapy. The subjects were classified into three groups by age. Using the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), each group was further divided into an independent-walking group and non-independent-walking group. Thirteen physical therapists and 8 occupational therapists, who were treating the subject children, rated the subjects using the ABC-J. [Results] Significant differences were observed between the independent-walking and the non-independent-walking groups in the stereotypy and lethargy scores of infants. [Conclusion] For schoolchildren and adolescents, no significant differences were observed between the independent-walking and the non-independent-walking groups in their problematic behavior scores.
[目的] 在本研究中，我们使用日语版异常行为检查表（ABC-J），对处于婴儿期、学龄期和青少年期的独立行走和非独立行走的残疾儿童的问题行为进行了检查，以确定这些行为是否与其粗大运动能力相关。[对象与方法] 对象为86名正在接受物理治疗的残疾儿童。按年龄将对象分为三组。使用粗大运动功能分类系统（GMFCS），每组再分为独立行走组和非独立行走组。治疗对象儿童的13名物理治疗师和8名职业治疗师使用ABC-J对对象进行评分。[结果] 在婴儿的刻板行为和嗜睡得分方面，独立行走组和非独立行走组之间观察到显著差异。[结论] 对于学龄儿童和青少年，独立行走组和非独立行走组在问题行为得分方面未观察到显著差异。
