Suppr超能文献

何时停止心肺复苏以及何时进行节律分析:高级心血管生命支持提供者之间可能存在的困惑。

When to Stop CPR and When to Perform Rhythm Analysis: Potential Confusion Among ACLS Providers.

作者信息

Giberson Brandon, Uber Amy, F Gaieski David, Miller Joseph B, Wira Charles, Berg Katherine, Giberson Tyler, Cocchi Michael N, S Abella Benjamin, Donnino Michael W

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2016 Sep;31(8):537-43. doi: 10.1177/0885066614561589. Epub 2014 Dec 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care providers nationwide are routinely trained in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), an American Heart Association program that teaches cardiac arrest management. Recent changes in the ACLS approach have de-emphasized routine pulse checks in an effort to promote uninterrupted chest compressions. We hypothesized that this new ACLS algorithm may lead to uncertainty regarding the appropriate action following detection of a pulse during a cardiac arrest.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study in which a Web-based survey was sent to ACLS-trained medical providers at 4 major urban tertiary care centers in the United States. The survey consisted of 5 multiple-choice, scenario-based ACLS questions, including our question of interest. Adult staff members with a valid ACLS certification were included.

RESULTS

A total of 347 surveys were analyzed. The response rate was 28.1%. The majority (53.6%) of responders were between 18 and 32 years old, and 59.9% were female. The majority (54.2%) of responders incorrectly stated that they would continue CPR and possibly administer additional therapies when a team member detects a pulse immediately following defibrillation. Secondarily, only 51.9% of respondents correctly chose to perform a rhythm check following 2 minutes of CPR. The other 3 survey questions were correctly answered an average of 89.1% of the time.

CONCLUSION

Confusion exists regarding whether or not CPR and cardiac medications should be continued in the presence of a pulse. Education may be warranted to emphasize avoiding compressions and medications when a palpable pulse is detected.

摘要

背景

美国全国的医疗保健提供者都定期接受高级心血管生命支持(ACLS)培训,这是美国心脏协会开展的一项教授心脏骤停管理的项目。ACLS方法最近的变化不再强调常规脉搏检查,以促进不间断的胸外按压。我们推测,这种新的ACLS算法可能会导致在心脏骤停期间检测到脉搏后,对于适当的行动产生不确定性。

方法

我们进行了一项观察性研究,向美国4个主要城市三级医疗中心接受过ACLS培训的医疗提供者发送了基于网络的调查问卷。该调查问卷包含5个基于场景的多项选择ACLS问题,包括我们感兴趣的问题。纳入拥有有效ACLS认证的成年工作人员。

结果

共分析了347份调查问卷。回复率为28.1%。大多数(53.6%)回复者年龄在18至32岁之间,59.9%为女性。大多数(54.2%)回复者错误地表示,当团队成员在除颤后立即检测到脉搏时,他们会继续进行心肺复苏(CPR)并可能给予额外治疗。其次,只有51.9%的受访者在进行2分钟心肺复苏后正确选择进行心律检查。其他3个调查问题的平均正确回答率为89.1%。

结论

在有脉搏的情况下是否应继续进行心肺复苏和使用心脏药物存在困惑。可能需要开展教育,以强调在检测到可触及的脉搏时避免按压和用药。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验