Roncadin Caroline, Hitzler Johann, Downie Andrea, Montour-Proulx Isabelle, Alyman Cheryl, Cairney Elizabeth, Spiegler Brenda J
The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 May;62(5):854-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25362. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
Children with Down syndrome (DS) have an elevated risk of developing acute leukemia, but little is known about treatment-related neuropsychological morbidity because they are systematically excluded from research in this area. The current study investigated neuropsychological outcomes in children with DS treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) compared to children with DS with no history of cancer.
Participants were 4 to 17 years of age at testing and were administered measures of intelligence, academic achievement, language, visual-motor and fine-motor skills, and adaptive function. Patients had been off treatment for at least 2 years.
The AML group (N = 12) had significantly lower verbal intelligence and receptive vocabulary compared to controls (N = 21). By contrast, the ALL group (N = 14) performed significantly worse than controls on measures of verbal intelligence, spelling, receptive and expressive vocabulary, visual-motor skills, and adaptive function.
Patients with DS treated for AML may have specific post-treatment morbidity in verbal function, whereas those treated for ALL have broader morbidity affecting multiple neuropsychological domains and overall adaptive function. We hypothesize that the broader impairment profile of ALL survivors may be related to a combination of the longer duration of central nervous system-directed treatment for ALL compared to AML and the concomitant limited access to intervention opportunities during active treatment.
唐氏综合征(DS)患儿患急性白血病的风险升高,但对于治疗相关的神经心理发病率知之甚少,因为他们被系统性地排除在该领域的研究之外。本研究调查了与无癌症病史的唐氏综合征患儿相比,接受急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)或急性髓系白血病(AML)治疗的唐氏综合征患儿的神经心理结局。
测试时参与者年龄在4至17岁之间,并接受了智力、学业成绩、语言、视觉运动和精细运动技能以及适应功能的测量。患者已停止治疗至少2年。
与对照组(N = 21)相比,AML组(N = 12)的言语智力和接受性词汇明显较低。相比之下,ALL组(N = 14)在言语智力、拼写、接受性和表达性词汇、视觉运动技能和适应功能的测量方面表现明显比对照组差。
接受AML治疗的DS患者在言语功能方面可能有特定的治疗后发病率,而接受ALL治疗的患者发病率更广泛,影响多个神经心理领域和整体适应功能。我们推测,ALL幸存者更广泛的损伤情况可能与ALL相比AML针对中枢神经系统的治疗持续时间更长以及在积极治疗期间获得干预机会有限有关。