Liu Qing, Chelly Jacques E, Williams John P, Gold Michael S
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, 15213, USA.
Division of Acute Interventional Perioperative Pain and Regional Anesthesia, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, 15213, USA.
Pain Med. 2015 May;16(5):998-1006. doi: 10.1111/pme.12652. Epub 2014 Dec 28.
While the safety and efficacy of peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain management has been established in several well controlled prospective trials, the local anesthetic (LA) concentration and volume used in these studies was associated with a significant increase muscle weakness due to motor nerve block. The purpose of the present retrospective study of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty was to assess the relative analgesic efficacy and functional outcomes of the low concentration, low volume of LA used in peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain management.
Twenty-four months of deidentified patient data were extracted from an electronic medical record system. All patients received opioids with or without continuous femoral and sciatic nerve block infusions for postoperative analgesia. Pain (resting and with activity), cumulative opioid and LA use were primary endpoints, participation in physical therapy (PT), muscle strength deficits and length of hospital stay (LOS) were secondary endpoints.
Postoperative pain and opioid use were significantly lower in patients with peripheral nerve blocks (n = 1,329) than those with opioids alone (n = 439). There was no detectable decrease in strength associated with nerve blocks, while a significantly greater proportion of patients with nerve blocks were able to participate in PT on postoperative day 1 (96.4% vs 57.1%). These differences were not due to the impact of the surgeon per se, but whether or not the surgeon used nerve blocks for pain management. There was a small but statistically significant decrease in the average LOS in patients with blocks.
This analysis supports the use of low concentration, low volume of LA based peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain management.
虽然外周神经阻滞用于术后疼痛管理的安全性和有效性已在多项严格控制的前瞻性试验中得到证实,但这些研究中使用的局部麻醉剂(LA)浓度和体积与运动神经阻滞导致的肌肉无力显著增加有关。本项对接受全膝关节置换术患者的回顾性研究旨在评估用于术后疼痛管理的外周神经阻滞中低浓度、小体积LA的相对镇痛效果和功能结局。
从电子病历系统中提取24个月的匿名患者数据。所有患者均接受了阿片类药物治疗,部分患者还接受了连续股神经和坐骨神经阻滞输注以进行术后镇痛。疼痛(静息时和活动时)、阿片类药物和LA的累积使用量是主要终点,参与物理治疗(PT)、肌肉力量缺陷和住院时间(LOS)是次要终点。
接受外周神经阻滞的患者(n = 1329)术后疼痛和阿片类药物使用量显著低于仅使用阿片类药物的患者(n = 439)。未检测到与神经阻滞相关的力量下降,而接受神经阻滞的患者中有显著更多比例能够在术后第1天参与PT(96.4%对57.1%)。这些差异并非由于外科医生本身的影响,而是外科医生是否使用神经阻滞进行疼痛管理。接受神经阻滞的患者平均住院时间有小幅但具有统计学意义的缩短。
该分析支持使用基于低浓度、小体积LA的外周神经阻滞进行术后疼痛管理。