Terragni Pierpaolo, Ranieri Vito Marco, Brazzi Luca
Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università di Torino and Dipartimento di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Feb;21(1):20-5. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000172.
To discuss the mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury and the pro and cons of the different approaches proposed by literature to minimize its impact in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Mechanical ventilation is indispensable to manage respiratory failure. The evolution of knowledge of the physiological principles and of the clinical implementation of mechanical ventilation is characterized by the shift of interest from its capability to restore 'normal gas exchange' to its capability of causing further lung damage and multisystem organ failure.
If one of the essential teachings to young intensivists in the 1980s was to ensure mechanical ventilation restored being able to immediately drain a pneumothorax (barotrauma), nowadays priority we teach to young intensivists is to implement 'protective' ventilation to protect the lungs from the pulmonary and systemic effects of ventilator-induced lung injury (biotrauma). At the same time, priority of clinical research shifted from the search of optimal ventilator settings (best positive end-expiratory pressure) and to the evaluation of 'super-protective' ventilation that integrating partial or total extracorporeal support tries to minimize the use of mechanical ventilation.
探讨呼吸机所致肺损伤的机制,以及文献中提出的不同方法在减轻其对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者影响方面的利弊。
机械通气对于治疗呼吸衰竭必不可少。机械通气生理原理及临床应用知识的发展,其特点是关注点从恢复“正常气体交换”的能力,转向其导致进一步肺损伤和多系统器官功能衰竭的能力。
如果说20世纪80年代对年轻重症监护医师的一项重要教导是确保机械通气能够立即排出气胸(气压伤),那么如今我们教导年轻重症监护医师的首要任务是实施“保护性”通气,以保护肺部免受呼吸机所致肺损伤(生物伤)的肺部和全身影响。与此同时,临床研究的重点从寻找最佳呼吸机设置(最佳呼气末正压),转向评估“超保护性”通气,这种通气整合了部分或全部体外支持,试图尽量减少机械通气的使用。