Chen Yuqing, Zhang Xingyi, Cheng Kewen, Zhou Xin
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200080, China. Email:
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Oct 21;94(38):2977-81.
To compare the inspiratory cycling-off synchronization with different expiratory trigger sensitivity (ETS) setting during noninvasive pressure support ventilation (PSV) under the conditions of system leak.
Ventilators were connected to a lung model (Hans Rudolph Series1101 simulator). And its mechanics was set in two models of obstructive and restrictive ventilatory dysfunction. All ventilators were set at 15 cmH2O (1 cmH2O = 0.098 kPa) pressure support and 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Tests were conducted at the level of air leaks (24-28 L/min). Cycling delay time, tidal volume and airflow were collected.
Compared with Curative Flexo ST 30 with the ETS setting at the most sensitive level, the use of digital Auto-Trak(TM) system (Respironics Synchrony) was associated with milder delay cycling ((68.9 ± 13.3) vs (121.4 ± 13.2) ms, P < 0.05) in obstructive condition. The tidal volume (VT), inspiratory time (TI vent) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased after adjusting the ETS level. Premature cycling was detected in restrictive condition with both ventilators. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and PEF significantly increased as VT and TI vent decreased. Delay cycling ((64.3 ± 15.3) ms) was present in Flexo ST 30 when ETS was at most insensitive level.
There are significant differences in performances and cycling-off in obstructive and restrictive conditions among 2 bilevel ventilators. And it may be due to the software of algorithm. Modifications of ETS can affect the ventilatory parameters to improve patient-ventilator synchrony in the presence of air leaks. The Auto-Trak system during PSV show similar results and better synchronzation compared with conventional adjustments.
比较在系统漏气情况下,无创压力支持通气(PSV)期间不同呼气触发灵敏度(ETS)设置时的吸气切换同步情况。
将呼吸机连接到肺模型(汉斯·鲁道夫1101系列模拟器)。其力学特性设置为阻塞性和限制性通气功能障碍两种模型。所有呼吸机均设置为压力支持15 cmH₂O(1 cmH₂O = 0.098 kPa)和呼气末正压(PEEP)5 cmH₂O。在漏气水平(24 - 28 L/min)下进行测试。收集切换延迟时间、潮气量和气流数据。
在阻塞性情况下,与ETS设置为最敏感水平的Curative Flexo ST 30相比,使用数字自动追踪(TM)系统(瑞思迈同步呼吸机)的切换延迟较轻((68.9 ± 13.3)对(121.4 ± 13.2)ms,P < 0.05)。调整ETS水平后,潮气量(VT)、吸气时间(TI vent)和呼气峰值流速(PEF)增加。在限制性情况下,两种呼吸机均检测到过早切换。随着VT和TI vent降低,吸气峰值流速(PIF)和PEF显著增加。当ETS处于最不敏感水平时Flexo ST 30存在切换延迟((64.3 ± 15.3)ms)。
两种双水平呼吸机在阻塞性和限制性情况下的性能和切换情况存在显著差异。这可能归因于算法软件。在存在漏气的情况下,调整ETS可影响通气参数以改善患者 - 呼吸机同步性。与传统调整相比,PSV期间的自动追踪系统显示出相似的结果且同步性更好。