Department of Biomedical Engineering, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen at the University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Aug;30(8):1817-1826. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.038. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
A medialized center of rotation (COR) in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) comes with limitations such as scapular notching and reduced range of motion. To mitigate these effects, lateralization and inferiorization of the COR are performed, but may adversely affect deltoid muscle force. The study purposes were to measure the effect of RTSA with varying glenosphere configurations on (1) the COR and (2) deltoid force compared with intact shoulders and shoulders with massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (PS-RCT). We hypothesized that the highest deltoid forces would occur in shoulders with PS-RCT, and that RTSA would lead to a decrease in required forces that is further minimized with lateralization and inferiorization of the COR but still higher compared with native shoulders with an intact rotator cuff.
In this study, 8 cadaveric shoulders were dissected leaving only the rotator cuff muscles and capsule intact. A custom apparatus incorporating motion capture and a dynamic tensile testing machine to measure the changes in COR and deltoid forces while simultaneously recording glenohumeral abduction was designed. Five consecutive testing states were tested: (1) intact shoulder, (2) PS-RCT, (3) RTSA with standard glenosphere, (4) RTSA with 4 mm lateralized glenosphere, and (5) RTSA with 2.5 mm inferiorized glenosphere. Statistical Parametric Mapping was used to analyze the deltoid force as a function of the abduction angle. One-way repeated-measures within-specimens analysis of variance was conducted, followed by post hoc t-tests for pairwise comparisons between the states.
All RTSA configurations shifted the COR medially and inferiorly with respect to native (standard: 4.2 ± 2.1 mm, 19.7 ± 3.6 mm; 4 mm lateralized: 3.9 ± 1.2 mm, 16.0 ± 1.8; 2.5 mm inferiorized: 6.9 ± 0.9 mm, 18.9 ± 1.7 mm). Analysis of variance showed a significant effect of specimen state on deltoid force across all abduction angles. Of the 10 paired t-test comparisons made between states, only 3 showed significant differences: (1) intact shoulders necessitated significantly lower deltoid force than specimens with PS-RCT below 42° abduction, (2) RTSAs with standard glenospheres required significantly lower deltoid force than RTSA with 4 mm lateralized glenospheres above 34° abduction, and (3) RTSAs with 2.5 mm inferiorized glenospheres had significantly lower deltoid force than RTSA with 4 mm of glenosphere lateralization at higher abduction angles.
RTSA with a 2.5 mm inferiorized glenosphere and no additional lateralization resulted in less deltoid force to abduct the arm compared with 4 mm lateralized glenospheres. Therefore, when aiming to mitigate downsides of a medialized COR, an inferiorized glenosphere may be preferable in terms of its effect on deltoid force.
在反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)中,中心旋转点(COR)的内侧化伴随着肩胛切迹和活动范围减小等限制。为了减轻这些影响,COR 被向外侧和向下侧移位,但这可能会对三角肌力量产生不利影响。本研究的目的是测量不同的关节盂假体配置对(1)COR 和(2)三角肌力量的影响,与完整肩和伴有巨大后上方肩袖撕裂(PS-RCT)的肩进行比较。我们假设在伴有 PS-RCT 的肩中会出现最高的三角肌力量,并且 RTSA 会导致所需力量的减少,通过 COR 的向外侧和向下侧移位可以进一步最小化,但仍高于具有完整肩袖的天然肩。
在这项研究中,8 具尸体肩被解剖,仅保留肩袖肌肉和关节囊完整。设计了一种定制的装置,结合运动捕捉和动态拉伸试验机,以同时记录盂肱关节外展时 COR 和三角肌力量的变化。进行了五个连续的测试状态:(1)完整肩,(2)PS-RCT,(3)标准关节盂假体的 RTSA,(4)4 毫米向外侧移位的关节盂假体的 RTSA,和(5)2.5 毫米向下移位的关节盂假体的 RTSA。使用统计参数映射来分析三角肌力量作为外展角度的函数。进行了样本内重复测量方差分析,然后进行了成对 t 检验以比较状态之间的差异。
所有 RTSA 配置都使 COR 相对于天然 COR 向内侧和向下侧移位(标准:4.2 ± 2.1 毫米,19.7 ± 3.6 毫米;4 毫米向外侧移位:3.9 ± 1.2 毫米,16.0 ± 1.8 毫米;2.5 毫米向下移位:6.9 ± 0.9 毫米,18.9 ± 1.7 毫米)。方差分析显示,在所有外展角度上,样本状态对三角肌力量有显著影响。在进行的 10 对状态间的配对 t 检验比较中,只有 3 项具有显著差异:(1)完整肩在 42°外展以下需要的三角肌力量明显低于伴有 PS-RCT 的标本,(2)标准关节盂假体的 RTSA 在 34°外展以上需要的三角肌力量明显低于 4 毫米向外侧移位的关节盂假体的 RTSA,和(3)2.5 毫米向下移位的关节盂假体的 RTSA 在较高的外展角度时需要的三角肌力量明显低于 4 毫米关节盂假体的向外侧移位。
与 4 毫米向外侧移位的关节盂假体相比,具有 2.5 毫米向下移位的关节盂假体和无额外向外侧移位的 RTSA 可使外展手臂所需的三角肌力量更小。因此,当旨在减轻内侧化 COR 的缺点时,向下移位的关节盂假体在三角肌力量方面可能更具优势。