Penn-Barwell J G, Myatt R W, Bennett P M, Sargeant I D
National Institute of Health Research, Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre (NIHR SRMRC), Birmingham, UK; Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM), Birmingham, UK.
Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM), Birmingham, UK.
Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):288-91. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.004. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
Extremity injuries define the surgical burden of recent conflicts. Current literature is inconclusive when assessing the merits of limb salvage over amputation. The aim of this study was to determine medium term functional outcomes in military casualties undergoing limb salvage for severe open tibia fractures, and compare them to equivalent outcomes for unilateral trans-tibial amputees. Cases of severe open diaphyseal tibia fractures sustained in combat between 2006 and 2010, as described in a previously published series, were contacted. Consenting individuals conducted a brief telephone interview and were asked to complete a SF-36 questionnaire. These results were compared to a similar cohort of 18 military patients who sustained a unilateral trans-tibial amputation between 2004 and 2010. Forty-nine patients with 57 severe open tibia fractures met the inclusion criteria. Telephone follow-up and SF-36 questionnaire data was available for 30 patients (61%). The median follow-up was 4 years (49 months, IQR 39-63). Ten of the 30 patients required revision surgery, three of which involved conversion from initial fixation to a circular frame for non- or mal-union. Twenty-two of the 30 patients (73%) recovered sufficiently to complete an age-standardised basic military fitness test. The median physical component score of SF-36 in the limb salvage group was 46 (IQR 35-54) which was similar to the trans-tibial amputation cohort (p=0.3057, Mann-Whitney). Similarly there was no difference in mental component scores between the limb salvage and amputation groups (p=0.1595, Mann-Whitney). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients in either the amputation or limb salvage group reporting pain (p=0.1157, Fisher's exact test) or with respect to SF-36 physical pain scores (p=0.5258, Mann-Whitney). This study demonstrates that medium term outcomes for military patients are similar following trans-tibial amputation or limb salvage following combat trauma.
四肢损伤是近期冲突中外科治疗的重点。目前的文献在评估保肢与截肢的利弊时尚无定论。本研究的目的是确定因严重开放性胫骨骨折接受保肢治疗的军事伤员的中期功能结局,并将其与单侧经胫骨截肢者的等效结局进行比较。我们联系了先前发表的系列研究中描述的2006年至2010年期间在战斗中发生严重开放性胫骨干骨折的病例。同意参与的个体接受了简短的电话访谈,并被要求完成一份SF-36问卷。这些结果与18名在2004年至2010年期间接受单侧经胫骨截肢的军事患者的类似队列进行了比较。49例患有57处严重开放性胫骨骨折的患者符合纳入标准。30例患者(61%)可获得电话随访和SF-36问卷数据。中位随访时间为4年(49个月,四分位间距39 - 63)。30例患者中有10例需要进行翻修手术,其中3例涉及从初始固定转换为环形外固定架以治疗骨不连或畸形愈合。30例患者中有22例(73%)恢复良好,足以完成年龄标准化的基本军事体能测试。保肢组SF-36的中位身体成分得分是46(四分位间距35 - 54),这与经胫骨截肢队列相似(p = 0.3057,曼-惠特尼检验)。同样,保肢组和截肢组之间的心理成分得分也没有差异(p = 0.1595,曼-惠特尼检验)。截肢组或保肢组报告疼痛的患者比例(p = 0.1157,费舍尔精确检验)或SF-36身体疼痛评分方面(p = 0.5258,曼-惠特尼检验)均无显著差异。本研究表明,军事患者经胫骨截肢或战斗创伤后保肢的中期结局相似。