Sheean Andrew J, Krueger Chad A, Napierala Matthew A, Stinner Daniel J, Hsu Joseph R
*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX; and †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Sep;28(9):523-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000054.
The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) predicted outcomes for soldiers sustaining combat-related Gustilo-Anderson type III open tibia fractures.
Retrospective cohort study.
Tertiary trauma center.
Service Members with combat-related type III open tibia fractures occurring between 2003 and 2007 treated definitively in a US military medical center.
Amputation or limb salvage.
MESS, amputation or limb salvage.
Complete data were available for 155 patients treated for type III open tibia fractures. One hundred ten patients had salvaged limbs, and 45 patients had lower extremity amputations. The mean MESS values for amputees and patients treated with limb salvage were 5.8 and 5.3 (P = 0.057), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of a MESS ≥7 predicting amputation was 35% and 87.8%, respectively. A MESS value of ≥7 was found to have a positive predictive value on 50%. Thirty-three percent of patients treated with amputation had an associated vascular injury versus 12.7% of patients treated with limb salvage (P < 0.0026).
There was no significant difference between MESS values of amputees and those treated with limb salvage. Moreover, these data demonstrate that the MESS is neither sensitive nor accurate in predicting amputation.
本研究旨在确定肢体严重损伤评分(MESS)对遭受与战斗相关的 Gustilo-Anderson Ⅲ型开放性胫骨骨折的士兵预后的预测程度。
回顾性队列研究。
三级创伤中心。
2003 年至 2007 年间在美国军事医疗中心接受确定性治疗的与战斗相关的Ⅲ型开放性胫骨骨折的军人。
截肢或保肢。
MESS、截肢或保肢情况。
155 例接受Ⅲ型开放性胫骨骨折治疗的患者有完整数据。110 例患者保肢成功,45 例患者下肢截肢。截肢患者和保肢治疗患者的平均 MESS 值分别为 5.8 和 5.3(P = 0.057)。MESS≥7 预测截肢的敏感性和特异性分别为 35%和 87.8%。发现 MESS 值≥7 的阳性预测值为 50%。截肢治疗的患者中有 33%伴有血管损伤,而保肢治疗的患者中这一比例为 12.7%(P < 0.0026)。
截肢患者和保肢治疗患者的 MESS 值之间无显著差异。此外,这些数据表明 MESS 在预测截肢方面既不敏感也不准确。