Skorska Malvina N, Geniole Shawn N, Vrysen Brandon M, McCormick Cheryl M, Bogaert Anthony F
Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Jul;44(5):1377-94. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0454-4. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
Biological models have typically framed sexual orientation in terms of effects of variation in fetal androgen signaling on sexual differentiation, although other biological models exist. Despite marked sex differences in facial structure, the relationship between sexual orientation and facial structure is understudied. A total of 52 lesbian women, 134 heterosexual women, 77 gay men, and 127 heterosexual men were recruited at a Canadian campus and various Canadian Pride and sexuality events. We found that facial structure differed depending on sexual orientation; substantial variation in sexual orientation was predicted using facial metrics computed by a facial modelling program from photographs of White faces. At the univariate level, lesbian and heterosexual women differed in 17 facial features (out of 63) and four were unique multivariate predictors in logistic regression. Gay and heterosexual men differed in 11 facial features at the univariate level, of which three were unique multivariate predictors. Some, but not all, of the facial metrics differed between the sexes. Lesbian women had noses that were more turned up (also more turned up in heterosexual men), mouths that were more puckered, smaller foreheads, and marginally more masculine face shapes (also in heterosexual men) than heterosexual women. Gay men had more convex cheeks, shorter noses (also in heterosexual women), and foreheads that were more tilted back relative to heterosexual men. Principal components analysis and discriminant functions analysis generally corroborated these results. The mechanisms underlying variation in craniofacial structure--both related and unrelated to sexual differentiation--may thus be important in understanding the development of sexual orientation.
生物模型通常根据胎儿雄激素信号变化对性分化的影响来界定性取向,不过也存在其他生物模型。尽管面部结构存在显著的性别差异,但性取向与面部结构之间的关系却鲜有研究。在加拿大一所大学校园以及各类加拿大骄傲节和性取向活动中,共招募了52名女同性恋者、134名异性恋女性、77名男同性恋者和127名异性恋男性。我们发现,面部结构因性取向而异;利用面部建模程序根据白人面部照片计算出的面部指标,可以预测性取向的显著差异。在单变量层面,女同性恋者和异性恋女性在63项面部特征中的17项存在差异,其中4项是逻辑回归中独特的多变量预测指标。男同性恋者和异性恋男性在单变量层面有11项面部特征不同,其中3项是独特的多变量预测指标。部分(但并非全部)面部指标在两性之间存在差异。与异性恋女性相比,女同性恋者的鼻子更翘(异性恋男性中也更翘)、嘴巴更撅、额头更小,面部形状略显更具男性化特征(异性恋男性中也如此)。男同性恋者的脸颊更凸出、鼻子更短(异性恋女性中也如此),额头相对于异性恋男性更向后倾斜。主成分分析和判别函数分析总体上证实了这些结果。因此,颅面结构变异背后的机制——无论与性分化相关与否——可能在理解性取向的发展方面具有重要意义。