Suppr超能文献

通过荧光激活细胞分选和磁激活细胞分选从原位肝癌荷瘤小鼠脾脏中分离髓源性抑制细胞亚群:异同点

Isolation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells subsets from spleens of orthotopic liver cancer-bearing mice by fluorescent-activated and magnetic-activated cell sorting: similarities and differences.

作者信息

Xu Yaping, Zhao Wenxiu, Wu Duan, Xu Jianfeng, Lin Suqiong, Tang Kai, Yin Zhenyu, Wang Xiaomin

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Chronic Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Xiamen University Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital) Xiamen, China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Oct 15;7(11):7545-53. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells that commonly expand during tumor development and that play a critical role in suppression of immune responses. MDSCs can be classified into two groups: Mo-MDSCs and G-MDSCs. These cells differ in their morphology, phenotype, differentiation ability, and immunosuppressive activity, and inhibit immune responses via different mechanisms. Therefore, identifying an effective method for isolating viable Mo-MDSCs and G-MDSCs is important. Here, we demonstrated the differences and similarities between fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) in sorting G-MDSCs and Mo-MDSCs. Both MACS and FACS could obtain G-MDSCs and Mo-MDSCs with high viability and purity. A high yield and purity of G-MDSCs could be obtained both by using FACS and MACS, because G-MDSCs are highly expressed in the spleen of tumor-bearing mice. However, Mo-MDSCs, which comprise a small population among leukocytes, when sorted by MACS, could be obtained at much greater cell number, although with a slightly lower purity, than when sorted by FACS. In conclusion, we recommended using both FACS and MACS for isolating G-MDSCs, and using MACS for isolation of Mo-MDSCs.

摘要

髓系来源的抑制细胞(MDSCs)是一群异质性的未成熟髓样细胞,在肿瘤发生发展过程中通常会扩增,并在抑制免疫反应中起关键作用。MDSCs可分为两组:单核细胞样MDSCs(Mo-MDSCs)和粒细胞样MDSCs(G-MDSCs)。这些细胞在形态、表型、分化能力和免疫抑制活性方面存在差异,并通过不同机制抑制免疫反应。因此,确定一种分离活的Mo-MDSCs和G-MDSCs的有效方法很重要。在此,我们展示了荧光激活细胞分选(FACS)和磁激活细胞分选(MACS)在分选G-MDSCs和Mo-MDSCs方面的异同。MACS和FACS都能获得高活力和高纯度的G-MDSCs和Mo-MDSCs。使用FACS和MACS都能获得高产率和高纯度的G-MDSCs,因为G-MDSCs在荷瘤小鼠脾脏中高表达。然而,Mo-MDSCs在白细胞中占比小,通过MACS分选时,虽然纯度略低,但获得的细胞数量比通过FACS分选时多得多。总之,我们建议同时使用FACS和MACS来分离G-MDSCs,使用MACS来分离Mo-MDSCs。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Signaling pathways involved in MDSC regulation.参与髓系来源抑制细胞(MDSC)调控的信号通路。
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Aug;1846(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验